public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfs: fix xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real for partial conversions
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:16:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240409231645.GK6390@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408145454.718047-8-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:54:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real takes parts or all of a delalloc extent
> and converts them to a real extent.  It is written to deal with any
> potential overlap of the to be converted range with the delalloc extent,
> but it turns out that currently only converting the entire extents, or a
> part starting at the beginning is actually exercised, as the only caller
> always tries to convert the entire delalloc extent, and either succeeds
> or at least progresses partially from the start.
> 
> If it only converts a tiny part of a delalloc extent, the indirect block
> calculation for the new delalloc extent (da_new) might be equivalent to that
> of the existing delalloc extent (da_new).  If this extent conversion now

                                   da_old?

The code changes make sense to me otherwise.

--D

> requires allocating an indirect block that gets accounted into da_new,
> leading to the assert that da_new must be smaller or equal to da_new
> unless we split the extent to trigger.
> 
> Except for the assert that case is actually handled by just trying to
> allocate more space, as that already handled for the split case (which
> currently can't be reached at all), so just reusing it should be fine.
> Except that without dipping into the reserved block pool that would make
> it a bit too easy to trigger a fs shutdown due to ENOSPC.  So in addition
> to adjusting the assert, also dip into the reserved block pool.
> 
> Note that I could only reproduce the assert with a change to only convert
> the actually asked range instead of the full delalloc extent from
> xfs_bmapi_write.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 08e13ebdee1b53..7700a48e013d5a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -1586,6 +1586,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  			if (error)
>  				goto done;
>  		}
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BMAP_LEFT_FILLING | BMAP_RIGHT_FILLING | BMAP_LEFT_CONTIG:
> @@ -1616,6 +1617,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  			if (error)
>  				goto done;
>  		}
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BMAP_LEFT_FILLING | BMAP_RIGHT_FILLING | BMAP_RIGHT_CONTIG:
> @@ -1650,6 +1652,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  			if (error)
>  				goto done;
>  		}
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BMAP_LEFT_FILLING | BMAP_RIGHT_FILLING:
> @@ -1684,6 +1687,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  				goto done;
>  			}
>  		}
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BMAP_LEFT_FILLING | BMAP_LEFT_CONTIG:
> @@ -1722,6 +1726,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  			if (error)
>  				goto done;
>  		}
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BMAP_LEFT_FILLING:
> @@ -1812,6 +1817,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  		xfs_iext_update_extent(bma->ip, state, &bma->icur, &PREV);
>  		xfs_iext_next(ifp, &bma->icur);
>  		xfs_iext_update_extent(bma->ip, state, &bma->icur, &RIGHT);
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BMAP_RIGHT_FILLING:
> @@ -1861,6 +1867,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  		PREV.br_blockcount = temp;
>  		xfs_iext_insert(bma->ip, &bma->icur, &PREV, state);
>  		xfs_iext_next(ifp, &bma->icur);
> +		ASSERT(da_new <= da_old);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case 0:
> @@ -1983,11 +1990,9 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
>  	}
>  
>  	/* adjust for changes in reserved delayed indirect blocks */
> -	if (da_new != da_old) {
> -		ASSERT(state == 0 || da_new < da_old);
> +	if (da_new != da_old)
>  		error = xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, (int64_t)(da_old - da_new),
> -				false);
> -	}
> +				da_new > da_old);
>  
>  	xfs_bmap_check_leaf_extents(bma->cur, bma->ip, whichfork);
>  done:
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-09 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08 14:54 RFC: extended version of the xfs_bmapi_write retval fix Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: fix error returns from xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10  4:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: remove the unusued tmp_logflags variable in xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: lifr a xfs_valid_startblock into xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: don't open code XFS_FILBLKS_MIN in xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: pass the actual offset and len to allocate to xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10  4:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: remove the xfs_iext_peek_prev_extent call in xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: fix xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real for partial conversions Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-04-10  4:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: do not allocate the entire delalloc extent in xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10  4:07     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240409231645.GK6390@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox