From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C356515444A; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712762161; cv=none; b=FbyjovreCzyp423UWuUYuj/eWDnZS8BVK4f6OJeOOwmAB03sOPxlAeuY+bgt7lNV5f+1S1pUPtCj6QfAqZjKmZn7m4nCVdNsCN8JHvq2bcocuDnWFtd5nWpF+/K/Da5JNhdxdJ+YF8cWzcB6VzAwcYATmf9E7ABZB0lK23utO+4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712762161; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o/ajN8fd9Y9XQ2N2GNLupffRWiyq9HCNocgVwRN5H5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZC4+YTMZUVoZYsR8POVWn7H/V0x4m7elwqzamggXSh7sKXeaUb9kvBdJd9eZjp9Iw3yNo7kiPEy7fs+MJTcW9mnxRt3HywfLePLEBRpfMebQ6gEL5cZ6u5icMoH9iyEHY92SDCd54BCLIDt0rSZbD+40aHW1q0muqp+h+TIVarA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YPt1dese; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YPt1dese" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4325EC433C7; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:16:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712762161; bh=o/ajN8fd9Y9XQ2N2GNLupffRWiyq9HCNocgVwRN5H5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YPt1deseP8F3/bfy4Wn33h8vd+eUgzxYd7LJzIl9B/OcskMzASt4+/WduwPH9YdNr IeVW4vvI1eTOt9wrFroHIy670XOXXOGzMizCLWYhpiaW9HV2/gYIqbde8ErucjRGTQ YCWn7IHZRalzKkUUMYJNJnPR+Lxc6PuJgMOI2g49GXkDwGdPYZOQlc56gew5MwS7zE eq4RAU/TO1n2RghUnP2lD+MHcEULj+9fiEeBVPf0uTLFt9ofR7SBshOH8zCWvw1/y0 A08LO2hltFgknHFmLJSNode+ApODj8+4CxScQ8Zwpe8Ii8K/nffhhjrwpZ/0V72em/ Er0uUYGWzbhxQ== Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:16:00 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Zorro Lang , Zorro Lang , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fix kernels without v5 support Message-ID: <20240410151600.GV6390@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20240408133243.694134-1-hch@lst.de> <20240408145554.ezvbgolzjppua4in@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> <20240408145939.GA26949@lst.de> <20240408190043.oib4lmiri7ssw3ez@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> <20240410144254.iiqrxlm64xc6mqa6@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> <20240410145140.GA8219@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240410145140.GA8219@lst.de> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 04:51:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:42:54PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > But as the review points from XFS list, looks like the patch 4/6 is better > > to not be merged, and the patch 6/6 need further changes? So I'll look forward > > the V2, to take more actions. > > Maybe you can take 1-3 and 5 for now and I'll rework the others? I second that. I'll deal with xfs/158, 160, and 526, but the other patches that were ok could go in. --D