public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:20:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240422112019.212467-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422112019.212467-1-hch@lst.de>

And to make that more clear, rearrange the code a bit and add asserts
and a comment.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 50d878d78a5e11..95921ad935477f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -594,28 +594,38 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = tp->t_mountp;
 	bool			rsvd = (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_RESERVE) != 0;
-	int64_t			blkdelta = 0;
-	int64_t			rtxdelta = 0;
+	int64_t			blkdelta = tp->t_blk_res;
+	int64_t			rtxdelta = tp->t_rtx_res;
 	int64_t			idelta = 0;
 	int64_t			ifreedelta = 0;
 	int			error;
 
-	/* calculate deltas */
-	if (tp->t_blk_res > 0)
-		blkdelta = tp->t_blk_res;
-	if ((tp->t_fdblocks_delta != 0) &&
-	    (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) ||
-	     (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)))
+	/*
+	 * Calculate the deltas.
+	 *
+	 * t_fdblocks_delta and t_frextents_delta can be positive or negative:
+	 *
+	 *  - positive values indicate blocks freed in the transaction.
+	 *  - negative values indicate blocks allocated in the transaction
+	 *
+	 * Negative values can only happen if the transaction has a block
+	 * reservation that covers the allocated block.  The end result is
+	 * that the calculated delta values must always be positive and we
+	 * can only put back previous allocated or reserved blocks here.
+	 */
+	ASSERT(tp->t_blk_res || tp->t_fdblocks_delta >= 0);
+	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
 	        blkdelta += tp->t_fdblocks_delta;
+		ASSERT(blkdelta >= 0);
+	}
 
-	if (tp->t_rtx_res > 0)
-		rtxdelta = tp->t_rtx_res;
-	if ((tp->t_frextents_delta != 0) &&
-	    (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY))
+	ASSERT(tp->t_rtx_res || tp->t_frextents_delta >= 0);
+	if (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY) {
 		rtxdelta += tp->t_frextents_delta;
+		ASSERT(rtxdelta >= 0);
+	}
 
-	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) ||
-	     (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
+	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
 		idelta = tp->t_icount_delta;
 		ifreedelta = tp->t_ifree_delta;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:16   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240422112019.212467-6-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox