public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: make sure sb_fdblocks is non-negative
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 10:46:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240601174604.GW52987@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531182918.5933-1-wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 11:29:18AM -0700, Wengang Wang wrote:
> A user with a completely full filesystem experienced an unexpected
> shutdown when the filesystem tried to write the superblock during
> runtime.
> kernel shows the following dmesg:
> 
> [    8.176281] XFS (dm-4): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_sb_write_verify+0x60/0x120 [xfs], xfs_sb block 0x0
> [    8.177417] XFS (dm-4): Unmount and run xfs_repair
> [    8.178016] XFS (dm-4): First 128 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer:
> [    8.178703] 00000000: 58 46 53 42 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 90 00 00  XFSB............
> [    8.179487] 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> [    8.180312] 00000020: cf 12 dc 89 ca 26 45 29 92 e6 e3 8d 3b b8 a2 c3  .....&E)....;...
> [    8.181150] 00000030: 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80  ................
> [    8.182003] 00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 81 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 82  ................
> [    8.182004] 00000050: 00 00 00 01 00 64 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00  .....d..........
> [    8.182004] 00000060: 00 00 64 00 b4 a5 02 00 02 00 00 08 00 00 00 00  ..d.............
> [    8.182005] 00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 09 09 03 17 00 00 19  ................
> [    8.182008] XFS (dm-4): Corruption of in-memory data detected.  Shutting down filesystem
> [    8.182010] XFS (dm-4): Please unmount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
> 
> When xfs_log_sb writes super block to disk, b_fdblocks is fetched from
> m_fdblocks without any lock. As m_fdblocks can experience a positive -> negative
>  -> positive changing when the FS reaches fullness (see xfs_mod_fdblocks)
> So there is a chance that sb_fdblocks is negative, and because sb_fdblocks is
> type of unsigned long long, it reads super big. And sb_fdblocks being bigger
> than sb_dblocks is a problem during log recovery, xfs_validate_sb_write()
> complains.
> 
> Fix:
> As sb_fdblocks will be re-calculated during mount when lazysbcount is enabled,
> We just need to make xfs_validate_sb_write() happy -- make sure sb_fdblocks is
> not nenative.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>

With hch's comment about long lines addressed,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
> V1 -> V2: add problem symptoms in patch description.
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index 09e4bf949bf8..6dc0731e82e8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ xfs_log_sb(
>  		mp->m_sb.sb_ifree = min_t(uint64_t,
>  				percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_ifree),
>  				mp->m_sb.sb_icount);
> -		mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks);
> +		mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&mp->m_fdblocks);
>  	}
>  
>  	xfs_sb_to_disk(bp->b_addr, &mp->m_sb);
> -- 
> 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
> 
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-01 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-31 18:29 [PATCH V2] xfs: make sure sb_fdblocks is non-negative Wengang Wang
2024-06-01  4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01 17:46 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240601174604.GW52987@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wen.gang.wang@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox