From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: document the design of iomap and how to port
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:15:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612221529.GM2764752@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734piacp7.fsf@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:07:40PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>
> "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 04:15:02PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Darrick,
> >>
> >> Resuming my review from where I left off yesterday.
> >
>
> <snip>
> >> > +Writes
> >> > +~~~~~~
> >> > +
> >> > +The ``iomap_file_buffered_write`` function writes an ``iocb`` to the
> >> > +pagecache.
> >> > +``IOMAP_WRITE`` or ``IOMAP_WRITE`` | ``IOMAP_NOWAIT`` will be passed as
> >> > +the ``flags`` argument to ``->iomap_begin``.
> >> > +Callers commonly take ``i_rwsem`` in either shared or exclusive mode.
> >>
> >> shared(e.g. aligned overwrites)
> >
>
> Ok, I see we were in buffered I/O section (Sorry, I misunderstood
> thinking this was for direct-io)
Aha. I'll change these headings to "Buffered Readahead and Reads" and
"Buffered Writes".
> > That's a matter of debate -- xfs locks out concurrent reads by taking
> > i_rwsem in exclusive mode, whereas (I think?) ext4 and most other
> > filesystems take it in shared mode and synchronizes readers and writers
> > with folio locks.
>
> Ext4 too takes inode lock in exclusive mode in case of
> buffered-write. It's the DIO writes/overwrites in ext4 which has special
> casing for shared/exclusive mode locking.
>
> But ext4 buffered-read does not take any inode lock (it uses
> generic_file_read_iter()). So the synchronization must happen via folio
> lock w.r.t buffered-writes.
>
> However, I am not sure if we have any filesystem taking VFS inode lock in
> shared more for buffered-writes.
In theory you could if no other metadata needed updating, such as a dumb
filesystem with fixed size files where timestamps don't matter.
> BTW -
> I really like all of the other updates that you made w.r.t the review
> comments. All of those looks more clear to me. (so not commenting on them
> individually).
>
> Thanks!
No, thank /you/ and everyone else for reading all the way through it.
I'll finish cleaning things up and put out a v2.
--D
> -ritesh
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-08 0:17 [PATCH] Documentation: document the design of iomap and how to port Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-09 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-09 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-10 14:18 ` Jan Kara
2024-06-10 21:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-10 22:25 ` Jan Kara
2024-06-11 1:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-12 0:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-11 16:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-11 21:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-10 8:57 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-10 23:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-11 6:43 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-11 21:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-12 6:55 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-11 10:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-11 23:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-12 6:37 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-12 22:15 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-06-12 13:24 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-13 17:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-14 15:01 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-06-14 20:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612221529.GM2764752@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox