From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: fold xfs_ilock_for_write_fault into xfs_write_fault
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:57:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620185712.GD103034@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619115426.332708-7-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:53:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now that the page fault handler has been refactored, the only caller
> of xfs_ilock_for_write_fault is simple enough and calls it
> unconditionally. Fold the logic and expand the comments explaining it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Makes sense to me,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 62a69ed796f2fd..05ea96661c475f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -227,21 +227,6 @@ xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write(
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int
> -xfs_ilock_for_write_fault(
> - struct xfs_inode *ip)
> -{
> - /* get a shared lock if no remapping in progress */
> - xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
> - if (!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IREMAPPING))
> - return XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED;
> -
> - /* wait for remapping to complete */
> - xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
> - xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> - return XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
> -}
> -
> STATIC ssize_t
> xfs_file_dio_read(
> struct kiocb *iocb,
> @@ -1294,18 +1279,30 @@ xfs_write_fault(
> unsigned int order)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> - unsigned int lock_mode;
> + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
> + unsigned int lock_mode = XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED;
> vm_fault_t ret;
>
> sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
> file_update_time(vmf->vma->vm_file);
>
> - lock_mode = xfs_ilock_for_write_fault(XFS_I(inode));
> + /*
> + * Normally we only need the shared mmaplock, but if a reflink remap is
> + * in progress we take the exclusive lock to wait for the remap to
> + * finish before taking a write fault.
> + */
> + xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
> + if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IREMAPPING)) {
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
> + xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> + lock_mode = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
> + }
> +
> if (IS_DAX(inode))
> ret = xfs_dax_fault_locked(vmf, order, true);
> else
> ret = iomap_page_mkwrite(vmf, &xfs_page_mkwrite_iomap_ops);
> - xfs_iunlock(XFS_I(inode), lock_mode);
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_mode);
>
> sb_end_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
> return ret;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 11:53 clean up I/O path inode locking helpers and the page fault handler Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: move the dio write relocking out of xfs_ilock_for_iomap Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: cleanup xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: simplify xfs_dax_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 5:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-21 17:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: refactor __xfs_filemap_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 5:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: always take XFS_MMAPLOCK shared in xfs_dax_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: fold xfs_ilock_for_write_fault into xfs_write_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:57 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-23 5:44 clean up I/O path inode locking helpers and the page fault handler v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 5:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: fold xfs_ilock_for_write_fault into xfs_write_fault Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620185712.GD103034@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox