From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] xfs: only free posteof blocks on first close
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:46:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240624154621.GK3058325@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240623053532.857496-8-hch@lst.de>
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 07:34:52AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Certain workloads fragment files on XFS very badly, such as a software
> package that creates a number of threads, each of which repeatedly run
> the sequence: open a file, perform a synchronous write, and close the
> file, which defeats the speculative preallocation mechanism. We work
> around this problem by only deleting posteof blocks the /first/ time a
> file is closed to preserve the behavior that unpacking a tarball lays
> out files one after the other with no gaps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> [hch: rebased, updated comment, renamed the flag]
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Someone please review this? The last person to try was Dave, five years
ago, and I do not know if he ever saw what it did to various workloads.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20190315034237.GL23020@dastard/
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 8d70171678fe24..de52aceabebc27 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1215,15 +1215,21 @@ xfs_file_release(
> * exposed to that problem.
> */
> if (xfs_iflags_test_and_clear(ip, XFS_ITRUNCATED)) {
> - xfs_iflags_clear(ip, XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE);
> + xfs_iflags_clear(ip, XFS_EOFBLOCKS_RELEASED);
> if (ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)
> filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
> }
>
> /*
> * XFS aggressively preallocates post-EOF space to generate contiguous
> - * allocations for writers that append to the end of the file and we
> - * try to free these when an open file context is released.
> + * allocations for writers that append to the end of the file.
> + *
> + * To support workloads that close and reopen the file frequently, these
> + * preallocations usually persist after a close unless it is the first
> + * close for the inode. This is a tradeoff to generate tightly packed
> + * data layouts for unpacking tarballs or similar archives that write
> + * one file after another without going back to it while keeping the
> + * preallocation for files that have recurring open/write/close cycles.
> *
> * There is no point in freeing blocks here for open but unlinked files
> * as they will be taken care of by the inactivation path soon.
> @@ -1241,25 +1247,9 @@ xfs_file_release(
> (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
> xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
> if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip) &&
> - !xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE)) {
> - /*
> - * Check if the inode is being opened, written and
> - * closed frequently and we have delayed allocation
> - * blocks outstanding (e.g. streaming writes from the
> - * NFS server), truncating the blocks past EOF will
> - * cause fragmentation to occur.
> - *
> - * In this case don't do the truncation, but we have to
> - * be careful how we detect this case. Blocks beyond EOF
> - * show up as i_delayed_blks even when the inode is
> - * clean, so we need to truncate them away first before
> - * checking for a dirty release. Hence on the first
> - * dirty close we will still remove the speculative
> - * allocation, but after that we will leave it in place.
> - */
> + !xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_EOFBLOCKS_RELEASED)) {
> xfs_free_eofblocks(ip);
> - if (ip->i_delayed_blks)
> - xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE);
> + xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_EOFBLOCKS_RELEASED);
> }
> xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index ae9851226f9913..548a4f00bcae1b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static inline bool xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> #define XFS_INEW (1 << 3) /* inode has just been allocated */
> #define XFS_IPRESERVE_DM_FIELDS (1 << 4) /* has legacy DMAPI fields set */
> #define XFS_ITRUNCATED (1 << 5) /* truncated down so flush-on-close */
> -#define XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE (1 << 6) /* dirty release already seen */
> +#define XFS_EOFBLOCKS_RELEASED (1 << 6) /* eofblocks were freed in ->release */
> #define XFS_IFLUSHING (1 << 7) /* inode is being flushed */
> #define __XFS_IPINNED_BIT 8 /* wakeup key for zero pin count */
> #define XFS_IPINNED (1 << __XFS_IPINNED_BIT)
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static inline bool xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> */
> #define XFS_IRECLAIM_RESET_FLAGS \
> (XFS_IRECLAIMABLE | XFS_IRECLAIM | \
> - XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE | XFS_ITRUNCATED | XFS_NEED_INACTIVE | \
> + XFS_EOFBLOCKS_RELEASED | XFS_ITRUNCATED | XFS_NEED_INACTIVE | \
> XFS_INACTIVATING | XFS_IQUOTAUNCHECKED)
>
> /*
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-23 5:34 post-EOF block handling revamp Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: fix freeing speculative preallocations for preallocated files Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: remove the i_mode check in xfs_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-07 15:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: refactor f_op->release handling Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: don't bother returning errors from xfs_file_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 15:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-07 14:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: skip all of xfs_file_release when shut down Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: don't free post-EOF blocks on read close Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: only free posteof blocks on first close Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:46 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-06-24 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: check XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE earlier in xfs_release_eofblocks Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: simplify extent lookup in xfs_can_free_eofblocks Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-23 5:34 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reclaim speculative preallocations for append only files Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 17:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 18:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240624154621.GK3058325@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox