linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] xfs: skip flushing log items during push
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:51:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240702185120.GL612460@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621174645.GF3058325@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:46:45AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 07:48:08AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:51:42PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > Further with no backoff we don't need to gather huge delwri lists to
> > > > mitigate the impact of backoffs, so we can submit IO more frequently
> > > > and reduce the time log items spend in flushing state by breaking
> > > > out of the item push loop once we've gathered enough IO to batch
> > > > submission effectively.
> > > 
> > > Is that what the new count > 1000 branch does?
> > 
> > That's my interpreation anyway.  I'll let Dave chime in if he disagrees.
> 
> <nod> I'll await a response on this...

<shrug> No response after 11 days, I'll not hold this up further over a
minor point.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D


> > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c      | 1 +
> > > >  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 6 +++++-
> > > 
> > > Does it make sense to do this for buffer or dquot items too?
> > 
> > Not having written this here is my 2 unqualified cents:
> > 
> > For dquots it looks like it could be easily ported over, but I guess no
> > one has been bothering with dquot performance work for a while as it's
> > also missing a bunch of other things we did to the inode.  But given that
> > according to Dave's commit log the іnode cluster flushing is a big part
> > of this dquots probably aren't as affected anyway as we flush them
> > individually (and there generally are a lot fewer dquot items in the AIL
> > anyway).
> 
> It probably helps that dquot "clusters" are also single fsblocks too.
> 
> > For buf items the buffers are queued up on the on-stack delwri list
> > and written when we flush them.  So we won't ever find already
> > flushing items.
> 
> Oh right, because only the AIL flushes logged buffers to disk.
> 
> --D
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20  7:21 xfs: byte-based grant head reservation tracking v4 Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: fix the contact address for the sysfs ABI documentation Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 15:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: move and rename xfs_trans_committed_bulk Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: AIL doesn't need manual pushing Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 19:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: background AIL push should target physical space Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 19:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21  5:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-21 16:18       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: ensure log tail is always up to date Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: l_last_sync_lsn is really AIL state Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: collapse xlog_state_set_callback in caller Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: track log space pinned by the AIL Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: pass the full grant head to accounting functions Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: grant heads track byte counts, not LSNs Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01  0:59   ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-20  7:21 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: skip flushing log items during push Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 19:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21  5:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-21 17:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-02 18:51         ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-07-02 23:29           ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-03  5:10             ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240702185120.GL612460@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).