From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: update XFS_IOC_DIOINFO memory alignment value
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 19:52:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711025206.GG612460@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711003637.2979807-1-david@fromorbit.com>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:36:37AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> As of v6.0, the DIO memory buffer alignment is no longer aligned to
> the logical sector size of the underlying block device. There is now
> a specific DMA alignment parameter that memory buffers should be
> aligned to. statx(STATX_DIOALIGN) gets this right, but
> XFS_IOC_DIOINFO does not - it still uses the older fixed alignment
> defined by the block device logical sector size.
>
> This was found because the s390 DASD driver increased DMA alignment
> to PAGE_SIZE in commit bc792884b76f ("s390/dasd: Establish DMA
> alignment") and DIO aligned to logical sector sizes have started
> failing on kernels with that commit. Fixing the "userspace fails
> because device alignment constraints increased" issue is not XFS's
> problem, but we really should be reporting the correct device memory
> alignment in XFS_IOC_DIOINFO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index f0117188f302..71eba4849e03 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -1368,7 +1368,8 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
> struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> struct dioattr da;
>
> - da.d_mem = da.d_miniosz = target->bt_logical_sectorsize;
> + da.d_mem = bdev_dma_alignment(target->bt_bdev);
bdev_dma_alignment returns a mask, so I think you want to add one here?
Though at this point, perhaps DIOINFO should query the STATX_DIOALIGN
information so xfs doesn't have to maintain this anymore?
(Or just make a helper that statx and DIOINFO can both call?)
--D
> + da.d_miniosz = target->bt_logical_sectorsize;
> da.d_maxiosz = INT_MAX & ~(da.d_miniosz - 1);
>
> if (copy_to_user(arg, &da, sizeof(da)))
> --
> 2.45.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 0:36 [PATCH] xfs: update XFS_IOC_DIOINFO memory alignment value Dave Chinner
2024-07-11 2:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-07-11 4:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-11 4:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-11 4:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-11 5:52 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-11 5:51 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711025206.GG612460@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox