From: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org,
Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: remove unused parameter in macro XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 07:27:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240721112701.212342-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> (raw)
In the macro definition of XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES, a parameter is accepted,
but it is not used. Hence, it should be removed.
This patch has only passed compilation test, but it should be fine.
Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h | 2 +-
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
index cb035da3f990..fb05f44f6c75 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ typedef uint8_t xfs_dqtype_t;
* And, of course, we also need to take into account the dquot log format item
* used to describe each dquot.
*/
-#define XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) \
+#define XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES \
((sizeof(struct xfs_dq_logformat) + sizeof(struct xfs_disk_dquot)) * 6)
#define XFS_IS_QUOTA_ON(mp) ((mp)->m_qflags & XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ACCT)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
index 3dc8f785bf29..45aaf169806a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
@@ -338,11 +338,11 @@ xfs_calc_write_reservation(
blksz);
t1 += adj;
t3 += adj;
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max3(t1, t2, t3);
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max3(t1, t2, t3);
}
t4 = xfs_calc_refcountbt_reservation(mp, 1);
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
}
unsigned int
@@ -410,11 +410,11 @@ xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(
xfs_refcountbt_block_count(mp, 4),
blksz);
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max3(t1, t2, t3);
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max3(t1, t2, t3);
}
t4 = xfs_calc_refcountbt_reservation(mp, 2);
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
}
unsigned int
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_rename_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_link_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_remove_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
t1 = xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp);
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_create_tmpfile_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- uint res = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ uint res = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
res += xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp);
return res + xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp);
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_ifree_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation(mp) +
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_ichange_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize);
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_addafork_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(2, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_dir_geo->blksize) +
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_attrsetm_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_attrrm_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH,
XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) +
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-21 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-21 11:27 Julian Sun [this message]
2024-07-23 2:20 ` [PATCH] xfs: remove unused parameter in macro XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240721112701.212342-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com \
--to=sunjunchao2870@gmail.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox