From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4438F14B07E; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722309911; cv=none; b=ueryJMzHy+Om5rL5riHvNK2yDJk6te1Hnqkhye/6jlcYfoHzxVCwIaHvuE1moRGvruASCpHyx9YlRqs82zX3RNTrvU5DDhYYUukZ+D7ALc+rBA7cQF6nnjyFP8fE5vO9U+9iC+XDutlMWBJ1oECk+chFX20rFG5nHFQdZ+ysvtE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722309911; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RZB/b45UPD7u+LonAKNKIdLUWboOv7At3DFODRHkTkg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kuaUa5XeDHN1v88SFpkVFYgi9aWFE2u/qh5Rt43VVx8Sv7SbG3tOVCnLS+NpRgWgP9QfiXiRWR8Du6D2E0Ii6CWKSPDjo6GZGtEiUf2CQVJ9+lXmlhIx+IROoVAMLQPdrIAK3DzKPkXTwWXjlY8CRqphUxtJU9QdPbCO/mG7bOs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Q5PgM5NG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Q5PgM5NG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C75F8C32786; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:25:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722309908; bh=RZB/b45UPD7u+LonAKNKIdLUWboOv7At3DFODRHkTkg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q5PgM5NGKlzuDhaqLHfBNXogKkIrAyzyjIDsRPES5WHiwKmgwwChgoiI5JwJLkPah xdJOq4m0ek7n5dd3zyNnEH7j4ol60n8W3YX0LmHM10jDAFMcK8j41JENYsRNNad68G rl/68bzxpHVdPJ9C/oqRD7XPBzN4K3EiW6kMe812drXNoGj3+kjRKM3sFYw/GHpOgO JZ5t8DlM+4a8sviqTbevyiCKs8a1tK3tEsrJefxGQDFALdY/UTqJE/9K/aN9ROh2Cr I159RgVFJGG8x80o1si+2HVKJdimsvvnFmm4UbtGZgtQL2pCrQubX+SfxCfXegssy7 lfeAzu5dmlh1A== Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:25:08 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: zlang@redhat.com Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v30.9] fstests: xfs filesystem properties Message-ID: <20240730032508.GA6337@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20240730031030.GA6333@frogsfrogsfrogs> <172230948293.1545890.16907565259543283790.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <172230948293.1545890.16907565259543283790.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 08:19:43PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > It would be very useful if system administrators could set properties for a > given xfs filesystem to control its behavior. This we can do easily and > extensibly by setting ATTR_ROOT (aka "trusted") extended attributes on the root > directory. To prevent this from becoming a weird free for all, let's add some > library and tooling support so that sysadmins simply run the xfs_property > program to administer these properties. Heh, I forgot to cc the patchbomb coverletter -- this is an RFC, not for merging at this time. --D