From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC8E038DCC for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722447932; cv=none; b=sSRKsOQt/5fF66VS2weHdZyfOh3AYv6tJXZqe8VHyc/fYLQJ8kSdX+CacDaAWYnbcg9KvIOfV62N/pCfYQ90opK3iDYluE5Ev8wcLisio3gOAaZhJP4zOAIIEmzyY/JeK5L82TN271DNBLrFyOPz/ii0MXBsPQhvcc6iQ15o3IQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722447932; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rj+jvHJPAgBL4vW7U123WqZVke0fl576Ggjy/HZJ/Ng=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gMe/J4D/5E9D4S9UGmwIJfd25sDfcN0PFckQGrqG3hPK6C/LXWijq2cknNtRc8mSoC/7ljwfy59Xd2OZ/Wr2/9PNpdJibFoUPIQbEQhDVxPTlYSTRFbs5DpyB0WlZ3JYYvKTwMJhzBbbS2sGaEerk9n5OLhLAReTYesOTDujYXY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GpI21bCy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GpI21bCy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F05BC4AF0F; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:45:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722447932; bh=rj+jvHJPAgBL4vW7U123WqZVke0fl576Ggjy/HZJ/Ng=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GpI21bCyW80vPDUh6n6z+y/PSWVXw73w0ef/96HtpOl8mP16i5cOOf74FXIeyWfCv mZo78xcNE3JGojlb7c9nY3fli/uF3p94UMs5/LRffd6IrjBoSNpU2632eUHiqSU+3l 2drbSg28b4EXZNKPFqh1IJXJbaJPiZZSpHk/utIDQMdfFR1ml6wNV5VcKZPBGcmOn2 p5pgG8F/gy9B8d3rMyQZlVVFtktA7QhkEys/xX/Lymr7GyfGB+GEK66P6AWu6AVXPx BQBWkzsb3V8L0qI7tBxmd04C3awI8GnIpCzAs1tvvoZJSxi8bh+aT6XLSFxiFGcDxX iUNtwG9DRDvFQ== Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:45:31 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libfrog: define a self_healing filesystem property Message-ID: <20240731174531.GJ6374@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <172230940983.1544039.13001736803793260744.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <172230941003.1544039.14396399914334113330.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240730235103.GM6352@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 08:43:19AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 04:51:03PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 02:56:50PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > self-healing sounds a little imposterous :) > > > > Do you have a better suggestion? > > Heh. Maybe actually make it to separate ones? > auto_scrub and auto_repair? I don't want multiple attributes because that enables sysadmins to give us mixed messages. What happens if we encounter this: auto_scrub=no auto_repair=yes auto_optimize=paula ? Better just to have one attribute and make them pick the one they want. How about auto_fsck={none,check,optimize,repair} ? --D