From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153BD81751 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723042606; cv=none; b=Ipftqn5AN9W+tJH/251SV5ZY3FU9JMFAmXAB51Cp0GHRWM4KqQnGn0+cJMqWIrlH9xH46aX4aOhd4Z+W/sYnM+nYK2cMJBAFvYipS8v0xIyUH7JziD8iN+SkFnhC6bzQhSZx5stxc6yVPvN84NErYJN9Z15zy8VlR86fXVl5bzw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723042606; c=relaxed/simple; bh=llMadhOXR8/1hsqQ2u6fm9lW2E1j1viNsOaWVN0BuNQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jCnn779Ehhp5jUAm7mfmZYMrJU1I7hSI+JsdNhYuO6WnZUxUjc8ewupYsv9V9Gp1zwH54HvfcoOIM/DpqMxmThps8D/7lysg5l254mXFgHMValnclfUELkEm0z81lXTk2l/n70vaGFv2sfQnysQ40NMkUqHxiwhdjVlbWj6VGNM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UxEqxWme; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UxEqxWme" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 999B1C32781; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:56:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723042605; bh=llMadhOXR8/1hsqQ2u6fm9lW2E1j1viNsOaWVN0BuNQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UxEqxWme0Iyf1F3ApGj7fa0qlu80svyOuGSBnW/jqfMeEU54A7Wne76NGfieLw5LJ B+TB2L/65gU0oVsIr4XQdUvnm5ym4Zf6v86QFYw08YwXRCpuQJVm6t2uew4nvH1L4D m09mYZ1BzZQ+dkF012zM1ZJAAaV1nJGQPfvZEo+vCmnhgHESsRlFAPtwUGQJ5zrYg3 HybqWBO9RKVGPjAWxChfJDbSr3nrvS0E7e4vlJ+W5RbAb8FYVlowj9cA8rIGZ7mGg+ hDxJRq1YcuGSLOkNStkustXlGCEzS2ougudbz0bYlxdQQLsnLKhdT/mWv7xATRvNjG N00Dg0U5MhWmw== Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 07:56:45 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Dave Chinner , Mateusz Guzik , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: xfs_release lock contention Message-ID: <20240807145645.GC6051@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20240807143759.GA3175@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240807143759.GA3175@lst.de> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:37:59PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 03:43:53PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hmmm, I thought I saw these patches go past on the list again > > recently. Yeah, that was a coupl eof months ago: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240623053532.857496-1-hch@lst.de/ > > > > Christoph, any progress on merging that patchset? > > I expected them to go into 6.11 but they didn't. I'll resend them > after retesting them as there weren't any actionable items except for > a few typo fixes. Heh, I think there's like one patch out of the whole bunch that didn't get a RVB tag, so that's probably why it didn't go in. :( --D