public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix handling of RCU freed inodes from other AGs in xfs_icwalk_ag
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:39:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812173956.GZ6051@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812052352.3786445-2-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 07:23:00AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When xfs_icwalk_ag skips an inode because it was RCU freed from another
> AG, the slot for the inode in the batch array needs to be zeroed.  We
> also really shouldn't try to grab the inode in that case (or at very
> least undo the grab), so move the call to xfs_icwalk_ag after this sanity
> check.
> 
> Fixes: 1a3e8f3da09c ("xfs: convert inode cache lookups to use RCU locking")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index ae3c049fd3a216..3ee92d3d1770db 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -1701,9 +1701,6 @@ xfs_icwalk_ag(
>  		for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
>  			struct xfs_inode *ip = batch[i];
>  
> -			if (done || !xfs_icwalk_igrab(goal, ip, icw))
> -				batch[i] = NULL;
> -
>  			/*
>  			 * Update the index for the next lookup. Catch
>  			 * overflows into the next AG range which can occur if
> @@ -1716,8 +1713,14 @@ xfs_icwalk_ag(
>  			 * us to see this inode, so another lookup from the
>  			 * same index will not find it again.
>  			 */
> -			if (XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino) != pag->pag_agno)
> +			if (XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino) != pag->pag_agno) {
> +				batch[i] = NULL;
>  				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (done || !xfs_icwalk_igrab(goal, ip, icw))
> +				batch[i] = NULL;

IOWs, if @ip has been freed and reallocated to a different AG, then we
don't want to touch it at all, not even to check IRECLAIMABLE in igrab.
I think that sounds correct so
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> +
>  			first_index = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino + 1);
>  			if (first_index < XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino))
>  				done = true;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-12 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12  5:22 iwalk fixes Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-12  5:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix handling of RCU freed inodes from other AGs in xfs_icwalk_ag Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-12 17:39   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-14 21:50   ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-12  5:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix handling of RCU freed inodes from other AGs in xrep_iunlink_mark_incore Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-12 17:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-14 22:04   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240812173956.GZ6051@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox