From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, dchinner@redhat.com, osandov@fb.com,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] xfs: Fix the owner setting issue for rmap query in xfs fsmap
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:21:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240819052140.GN865349@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240819005320.304211-2-wozizhi@huawei.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 08:53:19AM +0800, Zizhi Wo wrote:
> I notice a rmap query bug in xfs_io fsmap:
> [root@fedora ~]# xfs_io -c 'fsmap -vvvv' /mnt
> EXT: DEV BLOCK-RANGE OWNER FILE-OFFSET AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL
> 0: 253:16 [0..7]: static fs metadata 0 (0..7) 8
> 1: 253:16 [8..23]: per-AG metadata 0 (8..23) 16
> 2: 253:16 [24..39]: inode btree 0 (24..39) 16
> 3: 253:16 [40..47]: per-AG metadata 0 (40..47) 8
> 4: 253:16 [48..55]: refcount btree 0 (48..55) 8
> 5: 253:16 [56..103]: per-AG metadata 0 (56..103) 48
> 6: 253:16 [104..127]: free space 0 (104..127) 24
> ......
>
> Bug:
> [root@fedora ~]# xfs_io -c 'fsmap -vvvv -d 0 3' /mnt
> [root@fedora ~]#
> Normally, we should be able to get one record, but we got nothing.
>
> The root cause of this problem lies in the incorrect setting of rm_owner in
> the rmap query. In the case of the initial query where the owner is not
> set, __xfs_getfsmap_datadev() first sets info->high.rm_owner to ULLONG_MAX.
> This is done to prevent any omissions when comparing rmap items. However,
> if the current ag is detected to be the last one, the function sets info's
> high_irec based on the provided key. If high->rm_owner is not specified, it
> should continue to be set to ULLONG_MAX; otherwise, there will be issues
> with interval omissions. For example, consider "start" and "end" within the
> same block. If high->rm_owner == 0, it will be smaller than the founded
> record in rmapbt, resulting in a query with no records. The main call stack
> is as follows:
>
> xfs_ioc_getfsmap
> xfs_getfsmap
> xfs_getfsmap_datadev_rmapbt
> __xfs_getfsmap_datadev
> info->high.rm_owner = ULLONG_MAX
> if (pag->pag_agno == end_ag)
> xfs_fsmap_owner_to_rmap
> // set info->high.rm_owner = 0 because fmr_owner == -1ULL
> dest->rm_owner = 0
> // get nothing
> xfs_getfsmap_datadev_rmapbt_query
>
> The problem can be resolved by simply modify the xfs_fsmap_owner_to_rmap
> function internal logic to achieve.
>
> After applying this patch, the above problem have been solved:
> [root@fedora ~]# xfs_io -c 'fsmap -vvvv -d 0 3' /mnt
> EXT: DEV BLOCK-RANGE OWNER FILE-OFFSET AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL
> 0: 253:16 [0..7]: static fs metadata 0 (0..7) 8
>
> Fixes: e89c041338ed ("xfs: implement the GETFSMAP ioctl")
> Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c
> index 85dbb46452ca..3a30b36779db 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ xfs_fsmap_owner_to_rmap(
> switch (src->fmr_owner) {
> case 0: /* "lowest owner id possible" */
> case -1ULL: /* "highest owner id possible" */
> - dest->rm_owner = 0;
> + dest->rm_owner = src->fmr_owner;
> break;
> case XFS_FMR_OWN_FREE:
> dest->rm_owner = XFS_RMAP_OWN_NULL;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-19 0:53 [PATCH V4 0/2] Some bugfix for xfs fsmap Zizhi Wo
2024-08-19 0:53 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] xfs: Fix the owner setting issue for rmap query in " Zizhi Wo
2024-08-19 5:21 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-19 0:53 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] xfs: Fix missing interval for missing_owner " Zizhi Wo
2024-08-19 5:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-19 6:24 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-08-19 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-19 18:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-20 1:11 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-08-20 5:53 ` [PATCH V4 0/2] Some bugfix for " Chandan Babu R
2024-08-20 7:51 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-08-20 8:27 ` Chandan Babu R
2024-08-20 9:23 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-08-20 9:45 ` Zizhi Wo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240819052140.GN865349@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=wozizhi@huawei.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox