public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: support lowmode allocations in xfs_bmap_exact_minlen_extent_alloc
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:41:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240822034109.GB32681@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821160723.GA865349@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:07:23AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 07:04:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currently the debug-only xfs_bmap_exact_minlen_extent_alloc allocation
> > variant fails to drop into the lowmode last restor allocator, and
> 
>                                          last resort?

Yes.

> > +	/*
> > +	 * Use the low space allocator as it first does a "normal" AG iteration
> > +	 * and then drops the reservation to minlen, which might be required to
> > +	 * find an allocation for the transaction reservation when the file
> > +	 * system is very full.
> 
> Isn't it already doing a minlen allocation?  Oh, that probably refers to
> shrinking args->total, doesn't it.

Yes, without this patch ap->total is left at the full value and never
reduced.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-22  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-20 17:04 fix a DEBUG-only assert failure in xfs/538 Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: merge xfs_attr_leaf_try_add into xfs_attr_leaf_addname Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21 15:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: return bool from xfs_attr3_leaf_add Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21 15:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: distinguish extra split from real ENOSPC from xfs_attr3_leaf_split Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21 15:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-22  3:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: fold xfs_bmap_alloc_userdata into xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21 15:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: call xfs_bmap_exact_minlen_extent_alloc from xfs_bmap_btalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21  8:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21 16:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: support lowmode allocations in xfs_bmap_exact_minlen_extent_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-21 16:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-22  3:41     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-24  3:40 fix a DEBUG-only assert failure in xfs/538 v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-24  3:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: support lowmode allocations in xfs_bmap_exact_minlen_extent_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27  8:39   ` Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240822034109.GB32681@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox