From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] generic: test to run fsx eof pollution
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:37:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240829013701.GI6224@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828181534.41054-5-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Filesystem regressions related to partial page zeroing can go
> unnoticed for a decent amount of time. A recent example is the issue
> of iomap zero range not handling dirty pagecache over unwritten
> extents, which leads to wrong behavior on certain file extending
> operations (i.e. truncate, write extension, etc.).
>
> fsx does occasionally uncover these sorts of problems, but failures
> can be rare and/or require longer running tests outside what is
> typically run via full fstests regression runs. fsx now supports a
> mode that injects post-eof data in order to explicitly test partial
> eof zeroing behavior. This uncovers certain problems more quickly
> and applies coverage more broadly across size changing operations.
>
> Add a new test that runs an fsx instance (modeled after generic/127)
> with eof pollution mode enabled. While the test is generic, it is
> currently limited to XFS as that is currently the only known major
> fs that does enough zeroing to satisfy the strict semantics expected
> by fsx. The long term goal is to uncover and fix issues so more
> filesystems can enable this test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Looks good!
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> tests/generic/363 | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/363.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/363
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/363.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/363 b/tests/generic/363
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..477c111c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/363
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2024 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FSQA Test No. 363
> +#
> +# Run fsx with EOF pollution enabled. This provides test coverage for partial
> +# EOF page/block zeroing for operations that change file size.
> +#
> +
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest rw auto
> +
> +_require_test
> +
> +# currently only xfs performs enough zeroing to satisfy fsx
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +
> +# on failure, replace -q with -d to see post-eof writes in the dump output
> +run_fsx "-q -S 0 -e 1 -N 100000"
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/363.out b/tests/generic/363.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3d219cd0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/363.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 363
> +fsx -q -S 0 -e 1 -N 100000
> --
> 2.45.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 18:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests/fsx: test coverage for eof zeroing Brian Foster
2024-08-28 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] fsx: don't skip file size and buf updates on simulated ops Brian Foster
2024-08-29 1:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-29 14:56 ` Brian Foster
2024-08-28 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] fsx: factor out a file size update helper Brian Foster
2024-08-29 1:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-28 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] fsx: support eof page pollution for eof zeroing test coverage Brian Foster
2024-08-29 1:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-28 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] generic: test to run fsx eof pollution Brian Foster
2024-08-29 1:37 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-09-02 20:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests/fsx: test coverage for eof zeroing Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240829013701.GI6224@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox