linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, dchinner@redhat.com,
	cem@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, catherine.hoang@oracle.com,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 07:42:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007054229.GA307@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4d2180a-8baa-4636-a0a1-36e474fcd157@oracle.com>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 02:07:05PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> Sure, that is true (about being able to atomically write 1x FS block if the 
> bdev support it).
>
> But if we are going to add forcealign or similar later, then it would make 
> sense (to me) to have FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES (and its other flags) from the 
> beginning. I mean, for example, if FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN were enabled and we 
> want atomic writes, setting FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES would be rejected if AG 
> count is not aligned with extsize, or extsize is not a power-of-2, or 
> extsize exceeds bdev limits. So FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES could have some value 
> there.
>
> As such, it makes sense to have a consistent user experience and require 
> FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES from the beginning.

Well, even with forcealign we're not going to lose support for atomic
writes <= block size, are we?


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07  5:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04  9:22 [PATCH v7 0/8] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] block/fs: Pass an iocb to generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] fs: Export generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] fs/block: Check for IOCB_DIRECT in generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-04 12:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 12:45     ` John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES John Garry
2024-10-04 12:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 13:07     ` John Garry
2024-10-07  5:42       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-13 21:06         ` John Garry
2024-10-16  0:52           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007054229.GA307@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).