public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	zlang@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: test log recovery for extent frees right after growfs
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:04:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009080451.GA16822@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwVdtXUSwEXRpcuQ@bfoster>

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:28:37PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> FWIW, here's a quick hack at such a test. This is essentially a copy of
> xfs/104, tweaked to remove some of the output noise and whatnot, and
> hacked in some bits from generic/388 to do a shutdown and mount cycle
> per iteration.
> 
> I'm not sure if this reproduces your original problem, but this blows up
> pretty quickly on 6.12.0-rc2. I see a stream of warnings that start like
> this (buffer readahead path via log recovery):
> 
> [ 2807.764283] XFS (vdb2): xfs_buf_map_verify: daddr 0x3e803 out of range, EOFS 0x3e800
> [ 2807.768094] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 2807.770629] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28386 at fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c:553 xfs_buf_get_map+0x184e/0x2670 [xfs]
> 
> ... and then end up with an unrecoverable/unmountable fs. From the title
> it sounds like this may be a different issue though.. hm?

That's at least the same initial message I hit.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-10  4:31 [PATCH] xfs: test log recovery for extent frees right after growfs Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-10  8:57 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-10 11:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-10 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-10 15:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-10 16:13     ` Brian Foster
2024-10-08 16:28       ` Brian Foster
2024-10-09  8:04         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-09 12:35           ` Brian Foster
2024-10-09 12:43             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 15:14               ` Brian Foster
2024-10-10  6:51                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14  6:00                 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241009080451.GA16822@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox