From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
zlang@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: test log recovery for extent frees right after growfs
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:04:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009080451.GA16822@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwVdtXUSwEXRpcuQ@bfoster>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:28:37PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> FWIW, here's a quick hack at such a test. This is essentially a copy of
> xfs/104, tweaked to remove some of the output noise and whatnot, and
> hacked in some bits from generic/388 to do a shutdown and mount cycle
> per iteration.
>
> I'm not sure if this reproduces your original problem, but this blows up
> pretty quickly on 6.12.0-rc2. I see a stream of warnings that start like
> this (buffer readahead path via log recovery):
>
> [ 2807.764283] XFS (vdb2): xfs_buf_map_verify: daddr 0x3e803 out of range, EOFS 0x3e800
> [ 2807.768094] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 2807.770629] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28386 at fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c:553 xfs_buf_get_map+0x184e/0x2670 [xfs]
>
> ... and then end up with an unrecoverable/unmountable fs. From the title
> it sounds like this may be a different issue though.. hm?
That's at least the same initial message I hit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 4:31 [PATCH] xfs: test log recovery for extent frees right after growfs Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-10 8:57 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-10 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-10 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-10 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-10 16:13 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-08 16:28 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-09 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-09 12:35 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-09 12:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 15:14 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-10 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241009080451.GA16822@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox