From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Check for deallayed allocations before setting extsize
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:34:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010183447.GZ21877@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010063617.563365-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:06:17PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Extsize is allowed to be set on files with no data in it. For this,
> we were checking if the files have extents but missed to check if
> delayed extents were present. This patch adds that check.
>
> While we are at it, also refactor this check into a helper since
> its used in some other places as well like xfs_inactive() or
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags()
>
> **Without the patch (SUCCEEDS)**
>
> $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
>
> wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
>
> **With the patch (FAILS as expected)**
>
> $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
>
> wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR testfile: Invalid argument
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> * Changes since v1 *
>
> - RVB by Christoph
> - Added a helper to check if inode has data instead of
> open coding.
>
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Zv_cTc6cgxszKGy3@infradead.org/T/#mf949dafb2b2f63bea1f7c0ce5265a2527aaf22a9
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 5 +++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index bcc277fc0a83..3d083a8fd8ed 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ xfs_inactive(
>
> if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) &&
> (ip->i_disk_size != 0 || XFS_ISIZE(ip) != 0 ||
> - ip->i_df.if_nextents > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0))
> + xfs_inode_has_data(ip)))
> truncate = 1;
>
> if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IQUOTAUNCHECKED)) {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index 97ed912306fd..ae1ccf2a3c8b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -292,6 +292,11 @@ static inline bool xfs_is_cow_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> return xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) || xfs_is_always_cow_inode(ip);
> }
>
> +static inline bool xfs_inode_has_data(struct xfs_inode *ip)
Can you please change this to "const struct xfs_inode *ip"?
This predicate function doesn't change @ip.
I might've called it xfs_inode_has_filedata fwiw, but the current name
is fine with me.
--D
> +{
> + return (ip->i_df.if_nextents > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check if an inode has any data in the COW fork. This might be often false
> * even for inodes with the reflink flag when there is no pending COW operation.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index a20d426ef021..88b9c8cf0272 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
>
> if (rtflag != XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) {
> /* Can't change realtime flag if any extents are allocated. */
> - if (ip->i_df.if_nextents || ip->i_delayed_blks)
> + if (xfs_inode_has_data(ip))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> @@ -602,7 +602,8 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize(
> if (!fa->fsx_valid)
> return 0;
>
> - if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) && ip->i_df.if_nextents &&
> + if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) &&
> + xfs_inode_has_data(ip) &&
> XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_extsize) != fa->fsx_extsize)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> --
> 2.43.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 6:36 [PATCH v2] xfs: Check for deallayed allocations before setting extsize Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-10 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 8:56 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-10 18:34 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-11 8:51 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241010183447.GZ21877@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox