public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfs: pass the exact range to initialize to xfs_initialize_perag
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:53:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011075314.GA2749@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwfeiYzopK-iD24Y@bfoster>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:02:49AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > -	error = xfs_initialize_perag(mp, sbp->sb_agcount, sbp->sb_dblocks,
> > -			&mp->m_maxagi);
> > +	error = xfs_initialize_perag(mp, old_agcount, sbp->sb_agcount,
> > +			sbp->sb_dblocks, &mp->m_maxagi);
> 
> I assume this is because the superblock can change across recovery, but
> code wise this seems kind of easy to misread into thinking the variable
> is the same.

Which variable?

> I think the whole old/new terminology is kind of clunky for
> an interface that is not just for growfs. Maybe it would be more clear
> to use start/end terminology for xfs_initialize_perag(), then it's more
> straightforward that mount would init the full range whereas growfs
> inits a subrange.

fine with me.

> A oneliner comment or s/old_agcount/orig_agcount/ wouldn't hurt here
> either. Actually if that's the only purpose for this call and if you
> already have to sample sb_agcount, maybe just lifting/copying the if
> (old_agcount >= new_agcount) check into the caller would make the logic
> more self-explanatory. Hm?

Sure.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-11  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-30 16:41 fix recovery of allocator ops after a growfs Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: pass the exact range to initialize to xfs_initialize_perag Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:02   ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11  7:53     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-11 14:01       ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: merge the perag freeing helpers Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:02   ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: update the file system geometry after recoverying superblock buffers Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 16:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01  8:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 16:02       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-10 14:03   ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: error out when a superblock buffer updates reduces the agcount Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 16:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01  8:47     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:04   ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: don't use __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL in xfs_initialize_perag Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:04   ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: don't update file system geometry through transaction deltas Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:05   ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11  7:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 14:02       ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 17:13         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 18:41           ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 23:12             ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 23:29               ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-14  5:58                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 15:30                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-14 18:50               ` Brian Foster
2024-10-15 16:42                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-18 12:27                   ` Brian Foster
2024-10-21 16:59                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-23 14:45                       ` Brian Foster
2024-10-24 18:02                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-21 13:38                 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-23 15:06                   ` Brian Foster
2024-10-10 19:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11  7:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 16:44       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: split xfs_trans_mod_sb Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:06   ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11  7:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 14:05       ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 16:50         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241011075314.GA2749@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox