From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfs: pass the exact range to initialize to xfs_initialize_perag
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:53:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011075314.GA2749@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZwfeiYzopK-iD24Y@bfoster>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:02:49AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > - error = xfs_initialize_perag(mp, sbp->sb_agcount, sbp->sb_dblocks,
> > - &mp->m_maxagi);
> > + error = xfs_initialize_perag(mp, old_agcount, sbp->sb_agcount,
> > + sbp->sb_dblocks, &mp->m_maxagi);
>
> I assume this is because the superblock can change across recovery, but
> code wise this seems kind of easy to misread into thinking the variable
> is the same.
Which variable?
> I think the whole old/new terminology is kind of clunky for
> an interface that is not just for growfs. Maybe it would be more clear
> to use start/end terminology for xfs_initialize_perag(), then it's more
> straightforward that mount would init the full range whereas growfs
> inits a subrange.
fine with me.
> A oneliner comment or s/old_agcount/orig_agcount/ wouldn't hurt here
> either. Actually if that's the only purpose for this call and if you
> already have to sample sb_agcount, maybe just lifting/copying the if
> (old_agcount >= new_agcount) check into the caller would make the logic
> more self-explanatory. Hm?
Sure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 16:41 fix recovery of allocator ops after a growfs Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: pass the exact range to initialize to xfs_initialize_perag Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:02 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-11 14:01 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: merge the perag freeing helpers Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:02 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: update the file system geometry after recoverying superblock buffers Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 16:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-10 14:03 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: error out when a superblock buffer updates reduces the agcount Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 16:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:04 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: don't use __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL in xfs_initialize_perag Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:04 ` Brian Foster
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: don't update file system geometry through transaction deltas Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:05 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 14:02 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 18:41 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 23:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 23:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-14 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 15:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-14 18:50 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-15 16:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-18 12:27 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-21 16:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-23 14:45 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-24 18:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-21 13:38 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-23 15:06 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-10 19:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: split xfs_trans_mod_sb Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-10 14:06 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 7:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 14:05 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-11 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011075314.GA2749@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox