From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:40:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011164057.GY21853@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011163830.GX21853@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 08:24:27PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > Extsize is allowed to be set on files with no data in it. For this,
> > we were checking if the files have extents but missed to check if
> > delayed extents were present. This patch adds that check.
> >
> > While we are at it, also refactor this check into a helper since
> > its used in some other places as well like xfs_inactive() or
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags()
> >
> > **Without the patch (SUCCEEDS)**
> >
> > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> >
> > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> >
> > **With the patch (FAILS as expected)**
> >
> > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> >
> > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR testfile: Invalid argument
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Looks good now,
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
That said, could you add a fixes tag for the xfs_ioctl_setattr_*
changes, please?
--D
> --D
>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +-
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 5 +++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > index bcc277fc0a83..19dcb569a3e7 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ xfs_inactive(
> >
> > if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) &&
> > (ip->i_disk_size != 0 || XFS_ISIZE(ip) != 0 ||
> > - ip->i_df.if_nextents > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0))
> > + xfs_inode_has_filedata(ip)))
> > truncate = 1;
> >
> > if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IQUOTAUNCHECKED)) {
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > index 97ed912306fd..03944b6c5fba 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > @@ -292,6 +292,11 @@ static inline bool xfs_is_cow_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > return xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) || xfs_is_always_cow_inode(ip);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool xfs_inode_has_filedata(const struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > +{
> > + return ip->i_df.if_nextents > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Check if an inode has any data in the COW fork. This might be often false
> > * even for inodes with the reflink flag when there is no pending COW operation.
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index a20d426ef021..2567fd2a0994 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
> >
> > if (rtflag != XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) {
> > /* Can't change realtime flag if any extents are allocated. */
> > - if (ip->i_df.if_nextents || ip->i_delayed_blks)
> > + if (xfs_inode_has_filedata(ip))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize(
> > if (!fa->fsx_valid)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) && ip->i_df.if_nextents &&
> > + if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) && xfs_inode_has_filedata(ip) &&
> > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_extsize) != fa->fsx_extsize)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.5
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 14:54 [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-11 16:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 16:40 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-14 9:10 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-14 9:56 ` John Garry
2024-10-14 11:23 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-14 9:32 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-14 15:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-15 6:53 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-15 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-17 7:03 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-17 14:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-18 9:54 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011164057.GY21853@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox