From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:24:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241014152428.GQ21840@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014060725.GA20751@lst.de>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:07:25AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 01:49:36AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > Thanks for reworking this patch, it's been merged into fstests, named
> > xfs/629~632. But now these 4 cases always fail on upstream xfs, e.g
> > (diff output) [1][2][3][4]. Could you help to take a look at the
> > failure which Darick metioned above too :)
>
> What do you mean with upstream xfs? Any kernel before the eofblocks
> fixes will obviously fail. Always_cow will also always fail and I'll
> send a patch for that. Any other configuration you've seen?
fsdax, any config with an extent size hint set, and any time
sb_rextsize > 1 fsblock.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 8:45 xfs post-EOF block freeing fixes v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 8:45 ` [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 15:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-25 11:15 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-26 12:31 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-01 14:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-02 13:38 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-02 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-02 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-02 15:56 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-02 20:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-13 17:49 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-14 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 14:14 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-14 15:24 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-14 17:46 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-15 3:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-23 5:38 xfs post-EOF block freeing fixes Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 5:38 ` [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 13:03 ` Zorro Lang
2024-06-24 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241014152428.GQ21840@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).