From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C08A1171C for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728952460; cv=none; b=GzRKdnq2f/3hASVsQ9rx5lf+0pMroEOmhtJIeTkaF7xlp1NlBiDsoG9KvDPOlOqK0GUahHYRtndOgg3PhYsgqfBKivUI5WfmaooMz9J7SRDXagDxJlqKTjGi1DKc1Ws16f3X4IKDIMmfCqQyNMEKPv4Vp1FuTw5XmPmboLwLijQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728952460; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jAKDcVh769UR2/wcexxy7ruvVcjUoNHEr65CevzA/yU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aRlpu+TcX5IH11W9K7M4fYidhCVczKT0KYUD9iYljOw116zmUVXEVhBfWasnaJ6imub3c+NJ8YZrbWnXoSfR/P/XsbmEERkY1S6IOLOJ+BJ6V2EgFmaCpwWKyuLLY7ZtvQokCJ7/1ob4RZsWeyEUCYf/pyyh8wj4epEcR/O5nA4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VOGFzcy+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VOGFzcy+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1728952458; x=1760488458; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jAKDcVh769UR2/wcexxy7ruvVcjUoNHEr65CevzA/yU=; b=VOGFzcy+0wCAr5aF5KzTfB1RtUAujo6f/THXBqIK8yrdc16ls2+ElcSL OCOr11YU9Ru9InPNCiKnYDKSamNpYLryVeFLGEFs+3yirBtX1eF+Bs/bn aBEbK74Kyk7MkFvJ2ssmY7R8e1sWyknw4SNj4iZhA0/B9F4gS4N1bZsuL S5fJKwML+kb1mIPnRt8OmDkSn8KRX6KdknjqbefCdoIunHCtXO+FULnSO GR309iQ50Ci6YVEpJUidX7fG9Jf2DpswymY596Vdp1PF4BJlAWZEIFmV5 XrNwsafNXiH2bHx0xlKgGT4VYRfJ6OhWtZ59E/gWgFC2mTHxg6hwZR+wr A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FYupO99gTRCaP1LGGI21pg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +orn3obJQgGudoaFBEScmA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11225"; a="32243158" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,204,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="32243158" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Oct 2024 17:34:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MFn1EurHQnK/bx7YHFUr4Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +qDN62sFRPO70GWHX3jUXA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,204,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="77810996" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2024 17:34:16 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t0VVu-000HNZ-0w; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:34:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:34:00 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Darrick J. Wong" , Carlos Maiolino Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, xfs , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: port xfs/122 to the kernel Message-ID: <202410150820.elwPtYkE-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241011182407.GC21853@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241011182407.GC21853@frogsfrogsfrogs> Hi Darrick, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on xfs-linux/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241014] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Darrick-J-Wong/xfs-port-xfs-122-to-the-kernel/20241012-022552 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011182407.GC21853%40frogsfrogsfrogs patch subject: [PATCH] xfs: port xfs/122 to the kernel config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20241015 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410150820.elwPtYkE-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241015/202410150820.elwPtYkE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410150820.elwPtYkE-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/container_of.h:5, from include/linux/list.h:5, from include/linux/semaphore.h:11, from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:24, from fs/xfs/xfs.h:26, from fs/xfs/xfs_super.c:7: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h: In function 'xfs_check_ondisk_structs': >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_fsop_geom_v1) is wrong, expected 112" 78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' 77 | #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:9: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' 10 | static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:302:9: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' 302 | XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_fsop_geom_v1, 112); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +78 include/linux/build_bug.h bc6245e5efd70c4 Ian Abbott 2017-07-10 60 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 61 /** 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 62 * static_assert - check integer constant expression at build time 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 63 * 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 64 * static_assert() is a wrapper for the C11 _Static_assert, with a 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 65 * little macro magic to make the message optional (defaulting to the 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 66 * stringification of the tested expression). 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 67 * 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 68 * Contrary to BUILD_BUG_ON(), static_assert() can be used at global 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 69 * scope, but requires the expression to be an integer constant 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 70 * expression (i.e., it is not enough that __builtin_constant_p() is 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 71 * true for expr). 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 72 * 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 73 * Also note that BUILD_BUG_ON() fails the build if the condition is 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 74 * true, while static_assert() fails the build if the expression is 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 75 * false. 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 76 */ 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 77 #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 @78 #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) 6bab69c65013bed Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 79 07a368b3f55a79d Maxim Levitsky 2022-10-25 80 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki