public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	nirjhar@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:22:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015162237.GX21853@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zw4RYapUKWH5u7yt@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:23:21PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:28:56AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:02:45PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:40:57AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 08:24:27PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > > > > > Extsize is allowed to be set on files with no data in it. For this,
> > > > > > we were checking if the files have extents but missed to check if
> > > > > > delayed extents were present. This patch adds that check.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > While we are at it, also refactor this check into a helper since
> > > > > > its used in some other places as well like xfs_inactive() or
> > > > > > xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags()
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > **Without the patch (SUCCEEDS)**
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > > > > > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > **With the patch (FAILS as expected)**
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > > > > > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > > > > > xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR testfile: Invalid argument
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Looks good now,
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > That said, could you add a fixes tag for the xfs_ioctl_setattr_*
> > > > changes, please?
> > > 
> > > Actually a small doubt Darrick regarding the Fixes commit (asked inline
> > > below):
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --D
> > > > 
> > > > > --D
> > > > > 
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +-
> > > > > >  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 5 +++++
> > > > > >  fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > > > > > index bcc277fc0a83..19dcb569a3e7 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > > > > > @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ xfs_inactive(
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  	if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) &&
> > > > > >  	    (ip->i_disk_size != 0 || XFS_ISIZE(ip) != 0 ||
> > > > > > -	     ip->i_df.if_nextents > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0))
> > > > > > +	     xfs_inode_has_filedata(ip)))
> > > > > >  		truncate = 1;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  	if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IQUOTAUNCHECKED)) {
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > > > > > index 97ed912306fd..03944b6c5fba 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > > > > > @@ -292,6 +292,11 @@ static inline bool xfs_is_cow_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > > > > >  	return xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) || xfs_is_always_cow_inode(ip);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > +static inline bool xfs_inode_has_filedata(const struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	return ip->i_df.if_nextents > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >  /*
> > > > > >   * Check if an inode has any data in the COW fork.  This might be often false
> > > > > >   * even for inodes with the reflink flag when there is no pending COW operation.
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > > > > > index a20d426ef021..2567fd2a0994 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > > > > > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  	if (rtflag != XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) {
> > > > > >  		/* Can't change realtime flag if any extents are allocated. */
> > > > > > -		if (ip->i_df.if_nextents || ip->i_delayed_blks)
> > > > > > +		if (xfs_inode_has_filedata(ip))
> > > > > >  			return -EINVAL;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  		/*
> > > > > > @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize(
> > > > > >  	if (!fa->fsx_valid)
> > > > > >  		return 0;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -	if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) && ip->i_df.if_nextents &&
> > > > > > +	if (S_ISREG(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode) && xfs_inode_has_filedata(ip) &&
> > > 
> > > So seems like there have been lots of changes to this particular line
> > > mostly as a part of refactoring other areas but seems like the actual
> > > commit that introduced it was:
> > > 
> > >   commit e94af02a9cd7b6590bec81df9d6ab857d6cf322f
> > >   Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sgi.com>
> > >   Date:   Wed Nov 2 15:10:41 2005 +1100
> > >   
> > >       [XFS] fix old xfs_setattr mis-merge from irix; mostly harmless esp if not
> > >       using xfs rt
> > > 
> > > Before this we were actually checking ip->i_delayed_blks correctly. So just wanted 
> > > to confirm that the fixes would have the above commit right?
> > > 
> > > If this looks okay I'll send a revision with this above tags:
> > > 
> > > Fixes: e94af02a9cd7 ("[XFS] fix old xfs_setattr mis-merge from irix; mostly harmless esp if not using xfs rt")
> > 
> > Yeah, that sounds fine.  Want to write a quick fstest to bang on
> > xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize to force everyone to backport it? :)
> 
> Got it, thanks, I'll send a v4.
> 
> Regarding the tests, we were thinking of adding more comprehensive
> generic tests for extsize now that ext4 is also implementing it. We
> have a new team member Nirjhar (cc'd) who is interested in writing the 
> xfstest and is working on it as we speak.

Heh, welcome! :)

> Since the area is new to him, it might take a bit of time to get that
> out, hope that is okay?

Sounds good to me.  You might see how many of the tests/xfs/ stuff can
be pulled up to tests/generic/ as a starting point.

--D

> Regards,
> Ojaswin
> 
> > 
> > --D
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ojaswin
> > > 
> > > > > >  	    XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_extsize) != fa->fsx_extsize)
> > > > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > 2.43.5
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-11 14:54 [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-11 16:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-11 16:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-14  9:10     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-14  9:56       ` John Garry
2024-10-14 11:23         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-14  9:32     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-14 15:28       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-15  6:53         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-15 16:22           ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-17  7:03             ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2024-10-17 14:56               ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-18  9:54                 ` Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241015162237.GX21853@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox