Re: [PATCH 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:34:03PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> I believe you reproduced a problem with your customized realtime variant
> of the initial test. I've not been able to reproduce any test failures
> with patch 2 here, though I have tried to streamline the test a bit to
> reduce unnecessary bits (patch 1 still reproduces the original
> problems). I also don't tend to test much with rt, so it's possible my
> config is off somehow or another. Otherwise I _think_ I've included the
> necessary changes for rt support in the test itself.
> 
> Thoughts? I'd like to figure out what might be going on there before
> this should land..

Darrick mentioned that was just with his rt group patchset, which
make sense as we don't have per-group metadata without that.

Anyway, the series looks good to me, and I think it supersedes my
more targeted hand crafted reproducer.