public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:14:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241024181444.GE2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cac327a9ee44c42035d9702b3a146aebc95e28c.1729624806.git.nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:56:20AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy wrote:
> This commit adds new tests that checks the behaviour of xfs/ext4
> filesystems when extsize hint is set on file with inode size as 0, non-empty
> files with allocated and delalloc extents and so on.
> Although currently this test is placed under tests/generic, it
> only runs on xfs and there is an ongoing patch series[1] to enable
> extsize hints for ext4 as well.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/cover.1726034272.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Suggested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tests/generic/365     | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/generic/365.out |  26 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/365
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/365.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/365 b/tests/generic/365
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..85a7ce9a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/365
> @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2024 Nirjhar Roy (nirjhar@linux.ibm.com).  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 365
> +#
> +# This test verifies that extent allocation hint setting works correctly on files with
> +# no extents allocated and non-empty files which are truncated. It also checks that the
> +# extent hints setting fails with non-empty file i.e, with any file with allocated
> +# extents or delayed allocation. We also check if the extsize value and the
> +# xflag bit actually got reflected after setting/re-setting the extsize value.
> +
> +. ./common/config
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/xfs
> +
> +_begin_fstest ioctl quick
> +
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +
> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit XXXXXXXXXXXX \
> +    "xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize",
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +FILE_DATA_SIZE=1M

Do these tests work correctly with fsblock size of 64k?  Just curious
since Pankaj just sent a series doing 1M -> 4M bumps to fix quota
issues.

> +filter_extsz()
> +{
> +    sed "s/$EXTSIZE/EXTSIZE/g"
> +}
> +
> +setup()
> +{
> +    _scratch_mkfs >> "$seqres.full"  2>&1
> +    _scratch_mount >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1
> +    BLKSZ=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT`
> +    EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*2 ))

Might want to check that there isn't an extsize/cowextsize set on the
root directory due to mkfs options.

> +}
> +
> +read_file_extsize()
> +{
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" $1 | _filter_scratch | filter_extsz
> +}
> +
> +check_extsz_and_xflag()
> +{
> +    local filename=$1
> +    read_file_extsize $filename
> +    _test_xfs_xflags_field $filename "e" && echo "e flag set" || echo "e flag unset"
> +}
> +
> +check_extsz_xflag_across_remount()
> +{
> +    local filename=$1
> +    _scratch_cycle_mount
> +    check_extsz_and_xflag $filename
> +}
> +
> +# Extsize flag should be cleared when extsize is reset, so this function
> +# checks that this behavior is followed.
> +reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag()
> +{
> +    local filename=$1
> +    echo "Re-setting extsize hint to 0"
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize 0" $filename
> +    check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
> +}
> +
> +check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset()
> +{
> +    local filename=$1
> +    check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
> +    reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag $filename
> +}
> +
> +test_empty_file()
> +{
> +    echo "TEST: Set extsize on empty file"
> +    local filename=$1
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG \
> +        -c "open -f $filename" \
> +        -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \
> +
> +    check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset $filename
> +    echo
> +}
> +
> +test_data_delayed()
> +{
> +    echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation"
> +    local filename=$1
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG \
> +        -c "open -f $filename" \
> +        -c "pwrite -q  0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
> +        -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch
> +
> +    check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
> +    echo
> +}
> +
> +test_data_allocated()
> +{
> +    echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents"
> +    local filename=$1
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG \
> +        -c "open -f $filename" \
> +        -c "pwrite -qW  0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
> +        -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch
> +
> +    check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
> +    echo
> +}
> +
> +test_truncate_allocated()
> +{
> +    echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents"
> +    local filename=$1
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG \
> +        -c "open -f $filename" \
> +        -c "pwrite -qW  0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
> +        -c "truncate 0" \
> +        -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \
> +
> +    check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
> +    echo
> +}
> +
> +test_truncate_delayed()
> +{
> +    echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation"
> +    local filename=$1
> +    $XFS_IO_PROG \
> +        -c "open -f $filename" \
> +        -c "pwrite -q  0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
> +        -c "truncate 0" \
> +        -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \
> +
> +    check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
> +    echo
> +}

Does this work for filesystems that don't have delalloc?  Like fsdax
filesystems?

--D

> +setup
> +echo -e "EXTSIZE = $EXTSIZE BLOCKSIZE = $BLKSZ\n" >> "$seqres.full"
> +
> +NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX=$SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-
> +
> +test_empty_file "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"00
> +test_data_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"01
> +test_data_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"02
> +test_truncate_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"03
> +test_truncate_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"04
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/365.out b/tests/generic/365.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..38cd0885
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/365.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +QA output created by 365
> +TEST: Set extsize on empty file
> +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00
> +e flag set
> +Re-setting extsize hint to 0
> +[0] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00
> +e flag unset
> +
> +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation
> +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01: Invalid argument
> +[0] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01
> +e flag unset
> +
> +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents
> +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02: Invalid argument
> +[0] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02
> +e flag unset
> +
> +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents
> +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-03
> +e flag set
> +
> +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation
> +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-04
> +e flag set
> +
> -- 
> 2.43.5
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-24 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 19:26 [PATCH 0/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] common/xfs,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-24 18:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  2:56   ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-25  4:07     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  4:15       ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-25  5:27         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25  6:17         ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-25  6:16       ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-25  6:14     ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-24 18:14   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-25  6:12     ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-14  9:45     ` Nirjhar Roy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241024181444.GE2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox