From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ext4: Do not fallback to buffered-io for DIO atomic write
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:46:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241101144644.GF2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78fb5c40dde4847dc32af09e668a6f81fa251137.1730437365.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:20:54PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> atomic writes is currently only supported for single fsblock and only
> for direct-io. We should not return -ENOTBLK for atomic writes since we
> want the atomic write request to either complete fully or fail
> otherwise. Hence, we should never fallback to buffered-io in case of
> DIO atomic write requests.
> Let's also catch if this ever happens by adding some WARN_ON_ONCE before
> buffered-io handling for direct-io atomic writes. More details of the
> discussion [1].
>
> While at it let's add an inline helper ext4_want_directio_fallback() which
> simplifies the logic checks and inherently fixes condition on when to return
> -ENOTBLK which otherwise was always returning true for any write or directio in
> ext4_iomap_end(). It was ok since ext4 only supports direct-io via iomap.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/cover.1729825985.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/T/#m9dbecc11bed713ed0d7a486432c56b105b555f04
> Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # inline helper
Looks good to me now,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 7 +++++++
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 96d936f5584b..a7de03e47db0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,13 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> ssize_t err;
> loff_t endbyte;
>
> + /*
> + * There is no support for atomic writes on buffered-io yet,
> + * we should never fallback to buffered-io for DIO atomic
> + * writes.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC);
> +
> offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> err = ext4_buffered_write_iter(iocb, from);
> if (err < 0)
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 3e827cfa762e..5b9eeb74ce47 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3444,17 +3444,34 @@ static int ext4_iomap_overwrite_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline bool ext4_want_directio_fallback(unsigned flags, ssize_t written)
> +{
> + /* must be a directio to fall back to buffered */
> + if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_DIRECT)) !=
> + (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_DIRECT))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* atomic writes are all-or-nothing */
> + if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* can only try again if we wrote nothing */
> + return written == 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ext4_iomap_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> ssize_t written, unsigned flags, struct iomap *iomap)
> {
> /*
> * Check to see whether an error occurred while writing out the data to
> - * the allocated blocks. If so, return the magic error code so that we
> - * fallback to buffered I/O and attempt to complete the remainder of
> - * the I/O. Any blocks that may have been allocated in preparation for
> - * the direct I/O will be reused during buffered I/O.
> + * the allocated blocks. If so, return the magic error code for
> + * non-atomic write so that we fallback to buffered I/O and attempt to
> + * complete the remainder of the I/O.
> + * For non-atomic writes, any blocks that may have been
> + * allocated in preparation for the direct I/O will be reused during
> + * buffered I/O. For atomic write, we never fallback to buffered-io.
> */
> - if (flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_DIRECT) && written == 0)
> + if (ext4_want_directio_fallback(flags, written))
> return -ENOTBLK;
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.46.0
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 6:50 [PATCH v4 0/4] ext4: Add atomic writes support for DIO Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-11-01 6:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ext4: Add statx support for atomic writes Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-11-01 11:17 ` Jan Kara
2024-11-01 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-01 16:00 ` John Garry
2024-11-01 17:23 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-01 6:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] ext4: Check for atomic writes support in write iter Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-11-01 11:15 ` Jan Kara
2024-11-01 6:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ext4: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-11-01 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2024-11-01 6:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ext4: Do not fallback to buffered-io for DIO atomic write Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-11-01 11:13 ` Jan Kara
2024-11-01 14:46 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241101144644.GF2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox