public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: port ondisk structure checks from xfs/122 to the kernel
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 21:09:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241104050945.GH2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104042904.GC17773@lst.de>

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:29:04AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 03:19:05PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > +#define XFS_CHECK_SB_OFFSET(field, offset) \
> > +	XFS_CHECK_OFFSET(struct xfs_dsb, field, offset); \
> > +	XFS_CHECK_OFFSET(struct xfs_sb, field, offset);
> 
> Despite comments to the contrary, xfs_sb is purely an in-memory structure
> and nothing cares about it having the same layout as xfs_dsb.  As we've
> kept them in sync so far I'm fine with adding this check under the
> expectation that I can remove it again when I finally start removing
> struct xfs_sb, which is long overdue.

Sounds good to me -- the only reason it's here is because the current
codebase requires it.  And that's only after years of djwong-wtf
actually having unsynchronized xfs_sb/xfs_dsb, so I think the codebase
doesn't even require it, but I've not done an exhaustive search.

> Otherwise:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Thanks!

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-01 22:18 [PATCHSET v5.4] xfs: improve ondisk structure checks Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-01 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: convert struct typedefs in xfs_ondisk.h Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-04  4:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-01 22:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: separate space btree structures " Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-04  4:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-01 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: port ondisk structure checks from xfs/122 to the kernel Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-04  4:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-04  5:09     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-11-05 12:57 ` [PATCHSET v5.4] xfs: improve ondisk structure checks Carlos Maiolino
2024-11-05 15:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-05 22:06 [PATCHSET v5.5 10/10] " Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-05 22:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: port ondisk structure checks from xfs/122 to the kernel Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241104050945.GH2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox