public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] common/rc,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:28:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118162810.GI9425@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r07cco5p.fsf@gmail.com>

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 12:36:26AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 09:45:58AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy wrote:
> >> This patch defines a common helper function to test whether any of
> >> fsxattr xflags field is set or not. We will use this helper in the next
> >> patch for checking extsize (e) flag.
> >> 
> >> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  common/rc     |  7 +++++++
> >>  tests/xfs/207 | 13 ++-----------
> >>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> >> index 2af26f23..fc18fc94 100644
> >> --- a/common/rc
> >> +++ b/common/rc
> >> @@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ _md5_checksum()
> >>  	md5sum $1 | cut -d ' ' -f1
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +# Check whether a fsxattr xflags character ($2) field is set on a given file ($1).
> >> +# e.g, fsxattr.xflags =  0x80000800 [----------e-----X]
> >> +_test_fsx_xflags_field()
> >
> > How about we call this "_test_fsxattr_xflag" instead?
> >
> > fsx is already something else in fstests.
> >
> >> +{
> >> +    grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" "$1")
> >> +}
> >
> > Not sure why this lost the xfs_io | grep -q structure.  The return value
> > of the whole expression will always be the return value of the last
> > command in the pipeline.
> >
> 
> I guess it was suggested here [1]
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241025025651.okneano7d324nl4e@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com/

Ah.

> root-> grep -q "hello" <(echo "hello world"); echo $?
> 0
> 
> The cmd is not using the unnamed pipes ("|") any more. It's spawning the
> process () which does echo "hello world" and creating a named pipe or
> say temporary FD <() which is being read by grep now. So we still will
> have the correct return value. Slightly inefficitent compared to unnamed
> pipes though I agree. 

Well... it's subtle, being bash, right? :)

bash creates a pipe and a subprocess for the "echo hello world", then
hooks its stdout to the pipe, just like a regular "|" pipe.

But for "grep -q hello" things are different -- for the grep process,
the pipe is added as a new fd (e.g. /dev/fd/63), and then that path is
provided on the command line.  So what bash is doing is:

	grep -q "hello" /dev/fd/63

AFAICT for grep this makes no difference unless you want it to tell you
filenames:

$ grep -l hello <(echo hello world)
/dev/fd/63
$ echo hello world | grep -l hello
(standard input)

and I'm sure there's other weird implications that I'm not remembering.

> > (Correct?  I hate bash...)
> >
> 
> root-> ls -la <(echo "hello world");
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Nov 16 00:42 /dev/fd/63 -> 'pipe:[74211850]'
> 
> Did I make you hate it more? ;) 

Yep!

--D

> 
> -ritesh
> 
> > --D
> >
> >> +
> >>  # Write a byte into a range of a file
> >>  _pwrite_byte() {
> >>  	local pattern="$1"
> >> diff --git a/tests/xfs/207 b/tests/xfs/207
> >> index bbe21307..4f6826f3 100755
> >> --- a/tests/xfs/207
> >> +++ b/tests/xfs/207
> >> @@ -21,15 +21,6 @@ _require_cp_reflink
> >>  _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> >>  _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
> >>  
> >> -# Takes the fsxattr.xflags line,
> >> -# i.e. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-]
> >> -# and tests whether a flag character is set
> >> -test_xflag()
> >> -{
> >> -    local flg=$1
> >> -    grep -q "\[.*${flg}.*\]" && echo "$flg flag set" || echo "$flg flag unset"
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>  echo "Format and mount"
> >>  _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> >>  _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >> @@ -65,14 +56,14 @@ echo "Set cowextsize and check flag"
> >>  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 1048576" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >>  _scratch_cycle_mount
> >>  
> >> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C"
> >> +_test_fsx_xflags_field "$testdir/file3" "C" && echo "C flag set" || echo "C flag unset"
> >>  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >>  
> >>  echo "Unset cowextsize and check flag"
> >>  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >>  _scratch_cycle_mount
> >>  
> >> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C"
> >> +_test_fsx_xflags_field "$testdir/file3" "C" && echo "C flag set" || echo "C flag unset"
> >>  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >>  
> >>  status=0
> >> -- 
> >> 2.43.5
> >> 
> >> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-15  4:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] common/rc,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-15 19:06     ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-18 16:28       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-11-18 18:06         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-18  9:24     ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15  4:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15 16:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-18  9:24     ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-18 16:22       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-18 17:40         ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-18 20:27           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19  3:08         ` Nirjhar Roy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241118162810.GI9425@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox