From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] common/rc,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:28:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118162810.GI9425@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r07cco5p.fsf@gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 12:36:26AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 09:45:58AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy wrote:
> >> This patch defines a common helper function to test whether any of
> >> fsxattr xflags field is set or not. We will use this helper in the next
> >> patch for checking extsize (e) flag.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> common/rc | 7 +++++++
> >> tests/xfs/207 | 13 ++-----------
> >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> >> index 2af26f23..fc18fc94 100644
> >> --- a/common/rc
> >> +++ b/common/rc
> >> @@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ _md5_checksum()
> >> md5sum $1 | cut -d ' ' -f1
> >> }
> >>
> >> +# Check whether a fsxattr xflags character ($2) field is set on a given file ($1).
> >> +# e.g, fsxattr.xflags = 0x80000800 [----------e-----X]
> >> +_test_fsx_xflags_field()
> >
> > How about we call this "_test_fsxattr_xflag" instead?
> >
> > fsx is already something else in fstests.
> >
> >> +{
> >> + grep -q "fsxattr.xflags.*\[.*$2.*\]" <($XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" "$1")
> >> +}
> >
> > Not sure why this lost the xfs_io | grep -q structure. The return value
> > of the whole expression will always be the return value of the last
> > command in the pipeline.
> >
>
> I guess it was suggested here [1]
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241025025651.okneano7d324nl4e@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com/
Ah.
> root-> grep -q "hello" <(echo "hello world"); echo $?
> 0
>
> The cmd is not using the unnamed pipes ("|") any more. It's spawning the
> process () which does echo "hello world" and creating a named pipe or
> say temporary FD <() which is being read by grep now. So we still will
> have the correct return value. Slightly inefficitent compared to unnamed
> pipes though I agree.
Well... it's subtle, being bash, right? :)
bash creates a pipe and a subprocess for the "echo hello world", then
hooks its stdout to the pipe, just like a regular "|" pipe.
But for "grep -q hello" things are different -- for the grep process,
the pipe is added as a new fd (e.g. /dev/fd/63), and then that path is
provided on the command line. So what bash is doing is:
grep -q "hello" /dev/fd/63
AFAICT for grep this makes no difference unless you want it to tell you
filenames:
$ grep -l hello <(echo hello world)
/dev/fd/63
$ echo hello world | grep -l hello
(standard input)
and I'm sure there's other weird implications that I'm not remembering.
> > (Correct? I hate bash...)
> >
>
> root-> ls -la <(echo "hello world");
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Nov 16 00:42 /dev/fd/63 -> 'pipe:[74211850]'
>
> Did I make you hate it more? ;)
Yep!
--D
>
> -ritesh
>
> > --D
> >
> >> +
> >> # Write a byte into a range of a file
> >> _pwrite_byte() {
> >> local pattern="$1"
> >> diff --git a/tests/xfs/207 b/tests/xfs/207
> >> index bbe21307..4f6826f3 100755
> >> --- a/tests/xfs/207
> >> +++ b/tests/xfs/207
> >> @@ -21,15 +21,6 @@ _require_cp_reflink
> >> _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> >> _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
> >>
> >> -# Takes the fsxattr.xflags line,
> >> -# i.e. fsxattr.xflags = 0x0 [--------------C-]
> >> -# and tests whether a flag character is set
> >> -test_xflag()
> >> -{
> >> - local flg=$1
> >> - grep -q "\[.*${flg}.*\]" && echo "$flg flag set" || echo "$flg flag unset"
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> echo "Format and mount"
> >> _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> >> _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >> @@ -65,14 +56,14 @@ echo "Set cowextsize and check flag"
> >> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 1048576" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >> _scratch_cycle_mount
> >>
> >> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C"
> >> +_test_fsx_xflags_field "$testdir/file3" "C" && echo "C flag set" || echo "C flag unset"
> >> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >>
> >> echo "Unset cowextsize and check flag"
> >> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >> _scratch_cycle_mount
> >>
> >> -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "stat" $testdir/file3 | grep 'fsxattr.xflags' | test_xflag "C"
> >> +_test_fsx_xflags_field "$testdir/file3" "C" && echo "C flag set" || echo "C flag unset"
> >> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize" $testdir/file3 | _filter_scratch
> >>
> >> status=0
> >> --
> >> 2.43.5
> >>
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-15 4:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] common/rc,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15 16:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-15 19:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-18 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-11-18 18:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-18 9:24 ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-15 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-18 9:24 ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-11-18 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-18 17:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-11-18 20:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 3:08 ` Nirjhar Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241118162810.GI9425@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox