* small fixes for 6.13
@ 2024-11-19 15:49 Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper Christoph Hellwig
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-11-19 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs
Hi all,
two little fixes and a refactoring to prepare one of them for the
new rtgroup code.
Diffstat:
libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 +----
xfs_rtalloc.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper
2024-11-19 15:49 small fixes for 6.13 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-11-19 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't call xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup in xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay Christoph Hellwig
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-11-19 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs
Add a helper to check that the last block of a RT device is readable
to share the code between mount and growfs. This also adds the mount
time overflow check to growfs and improves the error messages.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index 0cb534d71119..90f4fdd47087 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -1225,6 +1225,34 @@ xfs_grow_last_rtg(
mp->m_sb.sb_rgextents;
}
+/*
+ * Read in the last block of the RT device to make sure it is accessible.
+ */
+static int
+xfs_rt_check_size(
+ struct xfs_mount *mp,
+ xfs_rfsblock_t last_block)
+{
+ xfs_daddr_t daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, last_block);
+ struct xfs_buf *bp;
+ int error;
+
+ if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
+ xfs_warn(mp, "RT device size overflow: %llu != %llu",
+ XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr), last_block);
+ return -EFBIG;
+ }
+
+ error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp, daddr,
+ XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
+ if (error)
+ xfs_warn(mp, "cannot read last RT device block (%lld)",
+ last_block);
+ else
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+ return error;
+}
+
/*
* Grow the realtime area of the filesystem.
*/
@@ -1236,7 +1264,6 @@ xfs_growfs_rt(
xfs_rgnumber_t old_rgcount = mp->m_sb.sb_rgcount;
xfs_rgnumber_t new_rgcount = 1;
xfs_rgnumber_t rgno;
- struct xfs_buf *bp;
xfs_agblock_t old_rextsize = mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
int error;
@@ -1273,15 +1300,10 @@ xfs_growfs_rt(
error = xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(&mp->m_sb, in->newblocks);
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
- /*
- * Read in the last block of the device, make sure it exists.
- */
- error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp,
- XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, in->newblocks - 1),
- XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
+
+ error = xfs_rt_check_size(mp, in->newblocks - 1);
if (error)
goto out_unlock;
- xfs_buf_relse(bp);
/*
* Calculate new parameters. These are the final values to be reached.
@@ -1408,10 +1430,6 @@ int /* error */
xfs_rtmount_init(
struct xfs_mount *mp) /* file system mount structure */
{
- struct xfs_buf *bp; /* buffer for last block of subvolume */
- xfs_daddr_t d; /* address of last block of subvolume */
- int error;
-
if (mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks == 0)
return 0;
if (mp->m_rtdev_targp == NULL) {
@@ -1422,25 +1440,7 @@ xfs_rtmount_init(
mp->m_rsumblocks = xfs_rtsummary_blockcount(mp, &mp->m_rsumlevels);
- /*
- * Check that the realtime section is an ok size.
- */
- d = (xfs_daddr_t)XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks);
- if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, d) != mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks) {
- xfs_warn(mp, "realtime mount -- %llu != %llu",
- (unsigned long long) XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, d),
- (unsigned long long) mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks);
- return -EFBIG;
- }
- error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp,
- d - XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1),
- XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
- if (error) {
- xfs_warn(mp, "realtime device size check failed");
- return error;
- }
- xfs_buf_relse(bp);
- return 0;
+ return xfs_rt_check_size(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks - 1);
}
static int
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size
2024-11-19 15:49 small fixes for 6.13 Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-11-19 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't call xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup in xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay Christoph Hellwig
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-11-19 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs
Use the proper helpers to deal with sparse rtbno encoding.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index 90f4fdd47087..a991b750df81 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -1233,13 +1233,13 @@ xfs_rt_check_size(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
xfs_rfsblock_t last_block)
{
- xfs_daddr_t daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, last_block);
+ xfs_daddr_t daddr = xfs_rtb_to_daddr(mp, last_block);
struct xfs_buf *bp;
int error;
- if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
+ if (xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
xfs_warn(mp, "RT device size overflow: %llu != %llu",
- XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr), last_block);
+ xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, daddr), last_block);
return -EFBIG;
}
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't call xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup in xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay
2024-11-19 15:49 small fixes for 6.13 Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-11-19 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-11-19 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs
xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay works entirely on delalloc extents, for
which xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup doesn't make sense.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 9052839305e2..5255f93bae31 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -2620,8 +2620,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(
*/
if ((state & BMAP_LEFT_VALID) && (state & BMAP_LEFT_DELAY) &&
left.br_startoff + left.br_blockcount == new->br_startoff &&
- left.br_blockcount + new->br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN &&
- xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup(ip, whichfork, &left, new))
+ left.br_blockcount + new->br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN)
state |= BMAP_LEFT_CONTIG;
if ((state & BMAP_RIGHT_VALID) && (state & BMAP_RIGHT_DELAY) &&
@@ -2629,8 +2628,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(
new->br_blockcount + right.br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN &&
(!(state & BMAP_LEFT_CONTIG) ||
(left.br_blockcount + new->br_blockcount +
- right.br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN)) &&
- xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup(ip, whichfork, new, &right))
+ right.br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN)))
state |= BMAP_RIGHT_CONTIG;
/*
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-11-19 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2024-11-19 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:49:47PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a helper to check that the last block of a RT device is readable
> to share the code between mount and growfs. This also adds the mount
> time overflow check to growfs and improves the error messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> index 0cb534d71119..90f4fdd47087 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> @@ -1225,6 +1225,34 @@ xfs_grow_last_rtg(
> mp->m_sb.sb_rgextents;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Read in the last block of the RT device to make sure it is accessible.
> + */
> +static int
> +xfs_rt_check_size(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + xfs_rfsblock_t last_block)
> +{
> + xfs_daddr_t daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, last_block);
> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> + int error;
> +
> + if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "RT device size overflow: %llu != %llu",
> + XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr), last_block);
> + return -EFBIG;
> + }
> +
> + error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp, daddr,
> + XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
> + if (error)
> + xfs_warn(mp, "cannot read last RT device block (%lld)",
> + last_block);
"cannot read last RT device sector"? Something to hint that the units
are 512b blocks, not fsblocks? This is certainly better than the old
message. :)
Also, should there be a similar function to handle the last datadev
read that mount and growfs perform?
--D
> + else
> + xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Grow the realtime area of the filesystem.
> */
> @@ -1236,7 +1264,6 @@ xfs_growfs_rt(
> xfs_rgnumber_t old_rgcount = mp->m_sb.sb_rgcount;
> xfs_rgnumber_t new_rgcount = 1;
> xfs_rgnumber_t rgno;
> - struct xfs_buf *bp;
> xfs_agblock_t old_rextsize = mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
> int error;
>
> @@ -1273,15 +1300,10 @@ xfs_growfs_rt(
> error = xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(&mp->m_sb, in->newblocks);
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock;
> - /*
> - * Read in the last block of the device, make sure it exists.
> - */
> - error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp,
> - XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, in->newblocks - 1),
> - XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
> +
> + error = xfs_rt_check_size(mp, in->newblocks - 1);
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock;
> - xfs_buf_relse(bp);
>
> /*
> * Calculate new parameters. These are the final values to be reached.
> @@ -1408,10 +1430,6 @@ int /* error */
> xfs_rtmount_init(
> struct xfs_mount *mp) /* file system mount structure */
> {
> - struct xfs_buf *bp; /* buffer for last block of subvolume */
> - xfs_daddr_t d; /* address of last block of subvolume */
> - int error;
> -
> if (mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks == 0)
> return 0;
> if (mp->m_rtdev_targp == NULL) {
> @@ -1422,25 +1440,7 @@ xfs_rtmount_init(
>
> mp->m_rsumblocks = xfs_rtsummary_blockcount(mp, &mp->m_rsumlevels);
>
> - /*
> - * Check that the realtime section is an ok size.
> - */
> - d = (xfs_daddr_t)XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks);
> - if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, d) != mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "realtime mount -- %llu != %llu",
> - (unsigned long long) XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, d),
> - (unsigned long long) mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks);
> - return -EFBIG;
> - }
> - error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp,
> - d - XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1),
> - XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
> - if (error) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "realtime device size check failed");
> - return error;
> - }
> - xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> - return 0;
> + return xfs_rt_check_size(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks - 1);
> }
>
> static int
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper
2024-11-19 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2024-11-19 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-11-19 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 08:15:43AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > + error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_rtdev_targp, daddr,
> > + XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, &bp, NULL);
> > + if (error)
> > + xfs_warn(mp, "cannot read last RT device block (%lld)",
> > + last_block);
>
> "cannot read last RT device sector"? Something to hint that the units
> are 512b blocks, not fsblocks? This is certainly better than the old
> message. :)
Sure.
> Also, should there be a similar function to handle the last datadev
> read that mount and growfs perform?
I'll take a look.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2024-11-19 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:49:48PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the proper helpers to deal with sparse rtbno encoding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> index 90f4fdd47087..a991b750df81 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> @@ -1233,13 +1233,13 @@ xfs_rt_check_size(
> struct xfs_mount *mp,
> xfs_rfsblock_t last_block)
> {
> - xfs_daddr_t daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, last_block);
> + xfs_daddr_t daddr = xfs_rtb_to_daddr(mp, last_block);
> struct xfs_buf *bp;
> int error;
>
> - if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
> + if (xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
Er... this converts the daddr to a segmented xfs_rtblock_t type, but
last_block is a non segmented xfs_rfsblock_t type. You can't compare
the two directly. I think the code was correct without this patch.
--D
> xfs_warn(mp, "RT device size overflow: %llu != %llu",
> - XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr), last_block);
> + xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, daddr), last_block);
> return -EFBIG;
> }
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't call xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup in xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't call xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup in xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2024-11-19 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:49:49PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay works entirely on delalloc extents, for
> which xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup doesn't make sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Oooooops :(
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 9052839305e2..5255f93bae31 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -2620,8 +2620,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(
> */
> if ((state & BMAP_LEFT_VALID) && (state & BMAP_LEFT_DELAY) &&
> left.br_startoff + left.br_blockcount == new->br_startoff &&
> - left.br_blockcount + new->br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN &&
> - xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup(ip, whichfork, &left, new))
> + left.br_blockcount + new->br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN)
> state |= BMAP_LEFT_CONTIG;
>
> if ((state & BMAP_RIGHT_VALID) && (state & BMAP_RIGHT_DELAY) &&
> @@ -2629,8 +2628,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(
> new->br_blockcount + right.br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN &&
> (!(state & BMAP_LEFT_CONTIG) ||
> (left.br_blockcount + new->br_blockcount +
> - right.br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN)) &&
> - xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup(ip, whichfork, new, &right))
> + right.br_blockcount <= XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN)))
> state |= BMAP_RIGHT_CONTIG;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size
2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2024-11-19 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-11-19 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Carlos Maiolino, linux-xfs
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 08:21:42AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > - xfs_daddr_t daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, last_block);
> > + xfs_daddr_t daddr = xfs_rtb_to_daddr(mp, last_block);
> > struct xfs_buf *bp;
> > int error;
> >
> > - if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
> > + if (xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, daddr) != last_block) {
>
> Er... this converts the daddr to a segmented xfs_rtblock_t type, but
> last_block is a non segmented xfs_rfsblock_t type. You can't compare
> the two directly. I think the code was correct without this patch.
Hmm. Yeah, it just breaks the other things I'm about to overload
xfs_rtb_to_daddr/xfs_daddr_to_rtb with.. Time for even more
helpers probably..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-19 16:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-19 15:49 small fixes for 6.13 Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out a xfs_rt_check_size helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use the proper conversion helpers in xfs_rt_check_size Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-19 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't call xfs_bmap_same_rtgroup in xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-19 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox