From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs/157: do not drop necessary mkfs options
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:52:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241121155201.GS9425@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241121093537.ae74gwbzl53yvsn2@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 05:35:37PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 02:26:14PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 03:08:00AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > > To give the test option "-L oldlabel" to _scratch_mkfs_sized, xfs/157
> > > does:
> > >
> > > MKFS_OPTIONS="-L oldlabel $MKFS_OPTIONS" _scratch_mkfs_sized $fs_size
> > >
> > > but the _scratch_mkfs_sized trys to keep the $fs_size, when mkfs
> > > fails with incompatible $MKFS_OPTIONS options, likes this:
> > >
> > > ** mkfs failed with extra mkfs options added to "-L oldlabel -m rmapbt=1" by test 157 **
> > > ** attempting to mkfs using only test 157 options: -d size=524288000 -b size=4096 **
> > >
> > > but the "-L oldlabel" is necessary, we shouldn't drop it. To avoid
> > > that, we give the "-L oldlabel" to _scratch_mkfs_sized through
> > > function parameters, not through global MKFS_OPTIONS.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > tests/xfs/157 | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/157 b/tests/xfs/157
> > > index 9b5badbae..f8f102d78 100755
> > > --- a/tests/xfs/157
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/157
> > > @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ scenario() {
> > > }
> > >
> > > check_label() {
> > > - MKFS_OPTIONS="-L oldlabel $MKFS_OPTIONS" _scratch_mkfs_sized $fs_size \
> > > - >> $seqres.full
> > > + _scratch_mkfs_sized "$fs_size" "" "-L oldlabel" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> >
> > Don't quote the "-L" and "oldlabel" within the same string unless you
> > want them passed as a single string to _scratch_mkfs. Right now that
> > works because although you have _scratch_mkfs_sized using "$@"
>
> I use "$@" just for _scratch_mkfs_sized can give an empty argument to
> _try_scratch_mkfs_sized to be its second argument.
>
> how about:
> _scratch_mkfs_sized "$fs_size" "" -L oldlabel
>
> > (doublequote-dollarsign-atsign-doublequote) to pass its arguments intact
> > to _scratch_mkfs, it turns out that _scratch_mkfs just brazely passes $*
> > (with no quoting) to the actual MKFS_PROG which results in any space in
> > any single argument being treated as an argument separator and the
> > string is broken into multiple arguments.
> >
> > This is why you *can't* do _scratch_mkfs -L "moo cow".
> >
> > This is also part of why everyone hates bash.
>
> Hmm... do you need to change the $* of _scratch_mkfs to $@ too?
Yeah, that's something that needs to be done treewide. The trouble is,
I bet there's other tests out there that have come to rely on the bad
splitting behavior and do things like
_scratch_fubar "-x 555"
becoming
execve("foobar", "-x" "555");
and will break if we try to fix it now.
--D
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > _scratch_xfs_db -c label
> > > _scratch_xfs_admin -L newlabel "$@" >> $seqres.full
> > > _scratch_xfs_db -c label
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-21 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-16 19:07 [PATCH 0/2] fstests: fix test issue of xfs/157 Zorro Lang
2024-11-16 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] common/rc: _scratch_mkfs_sized supports extra arguments Zorro Lang
2024-11-18 22:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-18 22:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-21 9:17 ` Zorro Lang
2024-11-21 15:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-16 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs/157: do not drop necessary mkfs options Zorro Lang
2024-11-18 22:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-21 9:35 ` Zorro Lang
2024-11-21 15:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241121155201.GS9425@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox