From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6C71917EE; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 07:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733385428; cv=none; b=DekGMCtKpCworuei8aw4wiJ0AYjsd7WP1SFhW0Wp5FsrvgFwRMJmLQQZfP1CqeyoEOClySswQMLxIf9XWztyafo4H8JeYJKXa36xJtoXDZTChgNpejKnieiC2frIDWeTEMSA7JiXvvxTDLyCOFSfq/ED2Xg42cfpta2ZEVjbrpI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733385428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bdq8vzYSfmz9LPGJNP9c2JSwOs2OYDd02yK0xwONFd0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mjlDCKiXlNDftPLN1bQESnSomyZb5hWafg1ZIhXJCLZV2LDaG08Apgjjc4oLJYTC+Djj6x1z4FPF1Ez0Fn2TKrShNdssK01W8mLb+1q9hnOWyjOusTPacg4GmPRs1B0X4U512yRlb1fmGeojaMV1d9wyjqSThHVbqHcJu5S6YIk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rpg8OEp1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rpg8OEp1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07E0EC4CED1; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 07:57:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733385428; bh=bdq8vzYSfmz9LPGJNP9c2JSwOs2OYDd02yK0xwONFd0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rpg8OEp1w+uBmo4Fr+6RWQqHLatxovxATvx8yVfW7FX4PURTLHPz+2A59Vk1gXuwa BSh8nYSrXLrjyp/BsFnyB0qSQtPsHZxFBBnpEO0ic/zl7a8IyjpELPXB9L3DcYn4aP nZP7j4mjFrfJ4W9yBDVmdQ+4abNeMC4E2JZ16C14BSwQS/FAJNt7BAJm+FAhidQ1IQ zF2pVjvhbsLpTovaD87+al03TxOKn2KPiliqYQ7c7H2Mervq1kCs5l9oaCZF3q8QS2 lZAGNAqDtKll/AXRerde5cMLZyI1ZLiW61LgMbTDPzdKSt91SAexijq6xA8pLFyPOM 1hTWZqRYsYMSA== Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 23:57:07 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Bill O'Donnell , cem@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2] xfs: proposed bug fixes for 6.13 Message-ID: <20241205075707.GK7837@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <173328106571.1145623.3212405760436181793.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20241205064243.GD7837@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:58:33PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > What Darrick wrote feels a little snarky, but he has a very valid > point. A lot of recent bug fixes come from better test coverage, where > better test coverage is mostly two new fuzzers hitting things, or > people using existing code for different things that weren't tested > much before. And Darrick is single handedly responsible for a large > part of the better test coverage, both due to fuzzing and specific > xfstests. As someone who's done a fair amount of new development > recently I'm extremely glad about all this extra coverage. Aww, thank you! :) --D