public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] iomap: simplify io_flags and io_type in struct iomap_ioend
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 05:53:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241213045305.GF5281@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212175504.GF6678@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:55:04AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > +#define IOMAP_IOEND_NOMERGE_FLAGS \
> > +	(IOMAP_IOEND_SHARED | IOMAP_IOEND_UNWRITTEN)
> 
> Hmm.  At first I wondered "Why wouldn't BOUNDARY be in here too?  It
> also prevents merging of ioends."  Then I remembered that BOUNDARY is an
> explicit nomerge flag, whereas what NOMERGE_FLAGS provides is that we
> always split ioends whenever the ioend work changes.
> 
> How about a comment?
> 
> /* split ioends when the type of completion work changes */
> #define IOMAP_IOEND_NOMERGE_FLAGS \
> 	(IOMAP_IOEND_SHARED | IOMAP_IOEND_UNWRITTEN)
> 
> Otherwise this looks fine to me.

The interesting thing about BOUNDARY is not just that it's explicit, but
also that it's one-way.  We can merge a non-BOUNDARY flag into the end
of a BOUNDARY one, just not a BOUNDARY one into the end of a non-BOUNDARY
one.

> 
> --D
> 
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Structure for writeback I/O completions.
> >   */
> >  struct iomap_ioend {
> >  	struct list_head	io_list;	/* next ioend in chain */
> > -	u16			io_type;
> > -	u16			io_flags;	/* IOMAP_F_* */
> > +	u16			io_flags;	/* IOMAP_IOEND_* */
> >  	struct inode		*io_inode;	/* file being written to */
> >  	size_t			io_size;	/* size of the extent */
> >  	loff_t			io_offset;	/* offset in the file */
> > -- 
> > 2.45.2
> > 
> > 
---end quoted text---

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-13  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11  8:53 RFC: iomap patches for zoned XFS Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] iomap: allow the file system to submit the writeback bios Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 17:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] iomap: simplify io_flags and io_type in struct iomap_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 17:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-13  4:53     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] iomap: add a IOMAP_F_ZONE_APPEND flag Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 18:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-13  4:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-16  4:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-19 17:30       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-19 17:35         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-19 17:36           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] iomap: split bios to zone append limits in the submission handlers Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 13:28   ` Brian Foster
2024-12-12 15:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 14:21   ` John Garry
2024-12-12 15:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 19:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-13  4:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] iomap: optionally use ioends for direct I/O Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 13:29   ` Brian Foster
2024-12-12 15:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 19:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-13  4:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] iomap: pass private data to iomap_page_mkwrite Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] iomap: pass private data to iomap_zero_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-11  8:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] iomap: pass private data to iomap_truncate_page Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 19:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-12-12 13:29 ` RFC: iomap patches for zoned XFS Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241213045305.GF5281@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox