From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB04D35948 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734633158; cv=none; b=ug+vmYoYOQE24E2KMpn2/yp/HtGqPSp5eIl6iEfbqM9HzNG5b5Iw08YLr7Tmj+hx0X+JsMy2MFwbwExzsuvKMIp+glGOpRHSGBMJAmU+UAt01hRqnapLBzCfKweZX1+BWNXbqQFGqcKWYeF3fq7NZvR0K8TjxouDM3HpVbg25mY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734633158; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eIUP9pCb+8j/e4rIF+L4uOzXbfS86zbDhMc/QElEzsw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=nuFCzXmO1ur+MLd8Sac2JhygB415MhaQtQce9NuHOyy6noYD8gA+7w2QjBNBw6XejZ22tihUvhRJqzQSDm4J/CzU0ugVMEZR6n+EXy1I4PPXCnrjF+xuwaYsUts4AtjPXse+KSP1Kf8VdjeVT6do+JwxFlRantQyYSPD1C5EjsY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PCoFoV+R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PCoFoV+R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E561C4CECE; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:32:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734633158; bh=eIUP9pCb+8j/e4rIF+L4uOzXbfS86zbDhMc/QElEzsw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=PCoFoV+R/KDsHw7csP+3LkOlJT7cYBts243BBSIvGKkGFSTDRKh7/xhQDheRlzJwR jIVbeK0I8P9XO4K1C/5UkjJ2Akr1YSVBjXi7T77XMXyq0bkMN+ryZlKBt2AsiSAQO+ z0db+tMJoQZjoYfJdiiM9pPlfcHHc5ypt+3UbaoqRav6b8Np7+L4NsGZUgMiTJFrfY 4YQIpqXajwMN7jg8PXCCGegZeyxjLG2lkf0Ru3UsMFriEMJzxmGzgby1F9M04ZF761 aAdqIaS3hXQ98cdCKZr2gHCZgF8jBg9t9xal5DbGNVc44+1qYAxJCBcqROXzom25hu bqfLbmgRWyGKQ== Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:32:37 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: helpdesk@kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o Cc: xfs , Catherine Hoang , Leah Rumancik , Chandan Babu R , Carlos Maiolino , Amir Goldstein Subject: Create xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev Message-ID: <20241219183237.GF6197@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi there, Could we create a separate mailing list to coordinate XFS LTS stable backporting work? There's enough traffic on the main XFS list that the LTS backports get lost in the noise, and in the future we'd like to have a place for our LTS testing robots to send automated email. A large portion of the upstream xfs community do not participate in LTS work so there's no reason to blast them with all that traffic. What do the rest of you think about this? Address : xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev Description: XFS stable LTS mailing list Owners : djwong@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Allow HTML : N Archives : Y --D