From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 18:02:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107020221.GV6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106095613.847700-5-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 10:54:41AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no good reason to pass a bool argument to wait for a buffer when
> the callers that want that can easily just wait themselves.
>
> This means the wait moves out of the extra hold of the buffer, but as the
> callers of synchronous buffer I/O need to hold a reference anyway that is
> perfectly fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
That's much cleaner...
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 1927655fed13..a3484421a6d8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -52,14 +52,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *xfs_buf_cache;
> * b_lock (trylock due to inversion)
> */
>
> -static int __xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp, bool wait);
> -
> -static inline int
> -xfs_buf_submit(
> - struct xfs_buf *bp)
> -{
> - return __xfs_buf_submit(bp, !(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC));
> -}
> +static int xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp);
> +static int xfs_buf_iowait(struct xfs_buf *bp);
>
> static inline bool xfs_buf_is_uncached(struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> @@ -797,13 +791,18 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
> struct xfs_buf *bp,
> xfs_buf_flags_t flags)
> {
> + int error;
> +
> ASSERT(!(flags & XBF_WRITE));
> ASSERT(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn != XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL);
>
> bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_WRITE | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD | XBF_DONE);
> bp->b_flags |= flags & (XBF_READ | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
>
> - return xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + if (!error && !(flags & XBF_ASYNC))
> + error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> + return error;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -978,9 +977,10 @@ xfs_buf_read_uncached(
> bp->b_flags |= XBF_READ;
> bp->b_ops = ops;
>
> - xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> - if (bp->b_error) {
> - error = bp->b_error;
> + error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + if (!error)
> + error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> + if (error) {
> xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> return error;
> }
> @@ -1483,6 +1483,8 @@ xfs_bwrite(
> XBF_DONE);
>
> error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + if (!error)
> + error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> if (error)
> xfs_force_shutdown(bp->b_mount, SHUTDOWN_META_IO_ERROR);
> return error;
> @@ -1698,9 +1700,8 @@ xfs_buf_iowait(
> * holds an additional reference itself.
> */
> static int
> -__xfs_buf_submit(
> - struct xfs_buf *bp,
> - bool wait)
> +xfs_buf_submit(
> + struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> int error = 0;
>
> @@ -1764,9 +1765,6 @@ __xfs_buf_submit(
> xfs_buf_ioend_async(bp);
> }
>
> - if (wait)
> - error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> -
> /*
> * Release the hold that keeps the buffer referenced for the entire
> * I/O. Note that if the buffer is async, it is not safe to reference
> @@ -2322,7 +2320,7 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(
> bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
> xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> }
> - __xfs_buf_submit(bp, false);
> + xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> }
> blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 9:54 buffer cache cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfs: fix a double completion for buffers on in-memory targets Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 02/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment above xfs_buf_free_maps Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 03/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment about the b_pag field Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:02 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfs: simplify xfs_buf_delwri_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 07/15] xfs: move write verification out of _xfs_buf_ioapply Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 08/15] xfs: move in-memory buftarg handling " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 10/15] xfs: move invalidate_kernel_vmap_range to xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfs: remove the extra buffer reference in xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 12/15] xfs: always complete the buffer inline " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 13/15] xfs: simplify xfsaild_resubmit_item Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfs: move b_li_list based retry handling to common code Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfs: add a b_iodone callback to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-13 14:12 buffer cache cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 18:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107020221.GV6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox