public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 22:31:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107063148.GX6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106095613.847700-7-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers has two callers for synchronous and
> asynchronous writes that share very little logic.  Split out a helper for
> the shared per-buffer loop and otherwise open code the submission in the
> two callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

Sheesh, splitting a function into two reduces line count by 11??
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 7edd7a1e9dae..e48d796c786b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -2259,72 +2259,26 @@ xfs_buf_cmp(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Submit buffers for write. If wait_list is specified, the buffers are
> - * submitted using sync I/O and placed on the wait list such that the caller can
> - * iowait each buffer. Otherwise async I/O is used and the buffers are released
> - * at I/O completion time. In either case, buffers remain locked until I/O
> - * completes and the buffer is released from the queue.
> - */
> -static int
> -xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(
> -	struct list_head	*buffer_list,
> -	struct list_head	*wait_list)
> +static bool
> +xfs_buf_delwri_submit_prep(
> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp)
>  {
> -	struct xfs_buf		*bp, *n;
> -	int			pinned = 0;
> -	struct blk_plug		plug;
> -
> -	list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
> -
> -	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, buffer_list, b_list) {
> -		if (!wait_list) {
> -			if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp))
> -				continue;
> -			if (xfs_buf_ispinned(bp)) {
> -				xfs_buf_unlock(bp);
> -				pinned++;
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -		} else {
> -			xfs_buf_lock(bp);
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Someone else might have written the buffer synchronously or
> -		 * marked it stale in the meantime.  In that case only the
> -		 * _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag got cleared, and we have to drop the
> -		 * reference and remove it from the list here.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q)) {
> -			xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> -			xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		trace_xfs_buf_delwri_split(bp, _RET_IP_);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * If we have a wait list, each buffer (and associated delwri
> -		 * queue reference) transfers to it and is submitted
> -		 * synchronously. Otherwise, drop the buffer from the delwri
> -		 * queue and submit async.
> -		 */
> -		bp->b_flags &= ~_XBF_DELWRI_Q;
> -		bp->b_flags |= XBF_WRITE;
> -		if (wait_list) {
> -			bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_ASYNC;
> -			list_move_tail(&bp->b_list, wait_list);
> -		} else {
> -			bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
> -			xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> -		}
> -		xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	/*
> +	 * Someone else might have written the buffer synchronously or marked it
> +	 * stale in the meantime.  In that case only the _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag got
> +	 * cleared, and we have to drop the reference and remove it from the
> +	 * list here.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q)) {
> +		xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> +		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> +		return false;
>  	}
> -	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>  
> -	return pinned;
> +	trace_xfs_buf_delwri_split(bp, _RET_IP_);
> +	bp->b_flags &= ~_XBF_DELWRI_Q;
> +	bp->b_flags |= XBF_WRITE;
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2347,7 +2301,30 @@ int
>  xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait(
>  	struct list_head	*buffer_list)
>  {
> -	return xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(buffer_list, NULL);
> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp, *n;
> +	int			pinned = 0;
> +	struct blk_plug		plug;
> +
> +	list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
> +
> +	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, buffer_list, b_list) {
> +		if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp))
> +			continue;
> +		if (xfs_buf_ispinned(bp)) {
> +			xfs_buf_unlock(bp);
> +			pinned++;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		if (!xfs_buf_delwri_submit_prep(bp))
> +			continue;
> +		bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
> +		xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> +		xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	}
> +	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> +
> +	return pinned;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2364,9 +2341,21 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_submit(
>  {
>  	LIST_HEAD		(wait_list);
>  	int			error = 0, error2;
> -	struct xfs_buf		*bp;
> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp, *n;
> +	struct blk_plug		plug;
>  
> -	xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(buffer_list, &wait_list);
> +	list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
> +
> +	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, buffer_list, b_list) {
> +		xfs_buf_lock(bp);
> +		if (!xfs_buf_delwri_submit_prep(bp))
> +			continue;
> +		bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_ASYNC;
> +		list_move_tail(&bp->b_list, &wait_list);
> +		xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> +	}
> +	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>  
>  	/* Wait for IO to complete. */
>  	while (!list_empty(&wait_list)) {
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06  9:54 buffer cache cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfs: fix a double completion for buffers on in-memory targets Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 02/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment above xfs_buf_free_maps Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 03/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment about the b_pag field Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfs: simplify xfs_buf_delwri_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:12       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:31   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-07  6:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 07/15] xfs: move write verification out of _xfs_buf_ioapply Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 08/15] xfs: move in-memory buftarg handling " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:57       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 10/15] xfs: move invalidate_kernel_vmap_range to xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfs: remove the extra buffer reference in xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 12/15] xfs: always complete the buffer inline " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 13/15] xfs: simplify xfsaild_resubmit_item Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfs: move b_li_list based retry handling to common code Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  7:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:18       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfs: add a b_iodone callback to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-13 14:12 buffer cache cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107063148.GX6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox