From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 22:31:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107063148.GX6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106095613.847700-7-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers has two callers for synchronous and
> asynchronous writes that share very little logic. Split out a helper for
> the shared per-buffer loop and otherwise open code the submission in the
> two callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
Sheesh, splitting a function into two reduces line count by 11??
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 7edd7a1e9dae..e48d796c786b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -2259,72 +2259,26 @@ xfs_buf_cmp(
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Submit buffers for write. If wait_list is specified, the buffers are
> - * submitted using sync I/O and placed on the wait list such that the caller can
> - * iowait each buffer. Otherwise async I/O is used and the buffers are released
> - * at I/O completion time. In either case, buffers remain locked until I/O
> - * completes and the buffer is released from the queue.
> - */
> -static int
> -xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(
> - struct list_head *buffer_list,
> - struct list_head *wait_list)
> +static bool
> +xfs_buf_delwri_submit_prep(
> + struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> - struct xfs_buf *bp, *n;
> - int pinned = 0;
> - struct blk_plug plug;
> -
> - list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
> -
> - blk_start_plug(&plug);
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, buffer_list, b_list) {
> - if (!wait_list) {
> - if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp))
> - continue;
> - if (xfs_buf_ispinned(bp)) {
> - xfs_buf_unlock(bp);
> - pinned++;
> - continue;
> - }
> - } else {
> - xfs_buf_lock(bp);
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Someone else might have written the buffer synchronously or
> - * marked it stale in the meantime. In that case only the
> - * _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag got cleared, and we have to drop the
> - * reference and remove it from the list here.
> - */
> - if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q)) {
> - xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> - xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - trace_xfs_buf_delwri_split(bp, _RET_IP_);
> -
> - /*
> - * If we have a wait list, each buffer (and associated delwri
> - * queue reference) transfers to it and is submitted
> - * synchronously. Otherwise, drop the buffer from the delwri
> - * queue and submit async.
> - */
> - bp->b_flags &= ~_XBF_DELWRI_Q;
> - bp->b_flags |= XBF_WRITE;
> - if (wait_list) {
> - bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_ASYNC;
> - list_move_tail(&bp->b_list, wait_list);
> - } else {
> - bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
> - xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> - }
> - xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + /*
> + * Someone else might have written the buffer synchronously or marked it
> + * stale in the meantime. In that case only the _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag got
> + * cleared, and we have to drop the reference and remove it from the
> + * list here.
> + */
> + if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q)) {
> + xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> + xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> + return false;
> }
> - blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> - return pinned;
> + trace_xfs_buf_delwri_split(bp, _RET_IP_);
> + bp->b_flags &= ~_XBF_DELWRI_Q;
> + bp->b_flags |= XBF_WRITE;
> + return true;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2347,7 +2301,30 @@ int
> xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait(
> struct list_head *buffer_list)
> {
> - return xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(buffer_list, NULL);
> + struct xfs_buf *bp, *n;
> + int pinned = 0;
> + struct blk_plug plug;
> +
> + list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
> +
> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, buffer_list, b_list) {
> + if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp))
> + continue;
> + if (xfs_buf_ispinned(bp)) {
> + xfs_buf_unlock(bp);
> + pinned++;
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (!xfs_buf_delwri_submit_prep(bp))
> + continue;
> + bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
> + xfs_buf_list_del(bp);
> + xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + }
> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> +
> + return pinned;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2364,9 +2341,21 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_submit(
> {
> LIST_HEAD (wait_list);
> int error = 0, error2;
> - struct xfs_buf *bp;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp, *n;
> + struct blk_plug plug;
>
> - xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(buffer_list, &wait_list);
> + list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
> +
> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, buffer_list, b_list) {
> + xfs_buf_lock(bp);
> + if (!xfs_buf_delwri_submit_prep(bp))
> + continue;
> + bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_ASYNC;
> + list_move_tail(&bp->b_list, &wait_list);
> + xfs_buf_submit(bp);
> + }
> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> /* Wait for IO to complete. */
> while (!list_empty(&wait_list)) {
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 9:54 buffer cache cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfs: fix a double completion for buffers on in-memory targets Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 02/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment above xfs_buf_free_maps Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 03/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment about the b_pag field Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfs: simplify xfs_buf_delwri_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 2:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:31 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-07 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 07/15] xfs: move write verification out of _xfs_buf_ioapply Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 08/15] xfs: move in-memory buftarg handling " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 10/15] xfs: move invalidate_kernel_vmap_range to xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfs: remove the extra buffer reference in xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 12/15] xfs: always complete the buffer inline " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 13/15] xfs: simplify xfsaild_resubmit_item Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfs: move b_li_list based retry handling to common code Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfs: add a b_iodone callback to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 6:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-13 14:12 buffer cache cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107063148.GX6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox