public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 22:57:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107065753.GF6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107064637.GA14460@lst.de>

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 07:46:37AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 10:42:24PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > So I guess b_io_remaining was the count of in-flight bios?
> 
> Yes.  Plus a bias of 1 for the submitting context so that the
> completion isn't run until all bios are submitted.
> 
> > And making a
> > chain of bios basically just moves all that to the bio layer, so all
> > xfs_buf needs to know is whether or not a bio is in progress, right?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Eerrugh, I spent quite a while trying to wrap my head around the old
> > code when I was writing the in-memory xfs_buf support.  This is much
> > less weird to look at...
> > 
> > > +	for (map = 0; map < bp->b_map_count - 1; map++) {
> > 
> > ...but why isn't this "map < bp->b_map_count"?
> 
> Because the final ("main") bio is submitted outside the loop as the
> loop body chains the ones before to it.  I guess this should go into
> a comment to confuse the readers a little less.

Ah, right, because we start with one bio for N maps, which means we need
to split it N-1 times to end up with N (chained) bios, one for each map.

Yes, comment please. :)

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06  9:54 buffer cache cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfs: fix a double completion for buffers on in-memory targets Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 02/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment above xfs_buf_free_maps Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 03/15] xfs: remove the incorrect comment about the b_pag field Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfs: move xfs_buf_iowait out of (__)xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfs: simplify xfs_buf_delwri_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  2:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:12       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfs: remove xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 07/15] xfs: move write verification out of _xfs_buf_ioapply Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 08/15] xfs: move in-memory buftarg handling " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  6:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:57       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 10/15] xfs: move invalidate_kernel_vmap_range to xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfs: remove the extra buffer reference in xfs_buf_submit Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 12/15] xfs: always complete the buffer inline " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 13/15] xfs: simplify xfsaild_resubmit_item Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfs: move b_li_list based retry handling to common code Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07  7:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:18       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfs: add a b_iodone callback to struct xfs_buf Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07  6:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-13 14:12 buffer cache cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:12 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfs: simplify buffer I/O submission Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 18:15   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107065753.GF6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox