From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
lonuxli.64@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: correct the sb_rgcount when the disk not support rt volume
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:32:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108003206.GL6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z30n-9IusvggTuwP@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 09:11:23PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 11:52:20AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 10:34:22AM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> > > When mounting an xfs disk that incompat with metadir and has no realtime
> > > subvolume, if CONFIG_XFS_RT is not enabled in the kernel, the mount will
> > > fail. During superblock log recovery, since mp->m_sb.sb_rgcount is greater
> > > than 0, updating the last rtag in-core is required, however, without
> > > CONFIG_XFS_RT enabled, xfs_update_last_rtgroup_size() always returns
> > > -EOPNOTSUPP, leading to mount failure.
> >
> > Didn't we fix the xfs_update_last_rtgroup_size stub to return 0?
> >
> > --D
>
> Indeed, when CONFIG_XFS_RT is not enabled, xfs_update_last_rtgroup_size() should
> return 0, as returning an error is meaningless.
>
> 1) For kernels without CONFIG_XFS_RT, mounting an image with realtime subvolume will
> fail at xfs_rtmount_init().
>
> 2) For kernels without CONFIG_XFS_RT, mounting an image without realtime subvolume
> should succeed.
>
> However, in the current scenario, should sb_rgcount be initialized to 0 ? it will
> consistent with metadir feature is enabled. The xfs-documentation [1] describes
> sb_rgcount as follows:
>
> "Count of realtime groups in the filesystem, if the XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_INCOMPAT_METADIR
> feature is enabled. If no realtime subvolume exists, this value will be zero."
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-documentation.git/tree/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/superblock.asciidoc
Ah, I see your point finally -- if there's no realtime section, then
there's no need to allocate any incore rtgroups, nor is there any point
to set sb_rgcount==1.
That said, I think the correct tags here are:
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.13-rc1
Fixes: 96768e91511bfc ("xfs: define the format of rt groups")
because 96768e91511bfc is the commit that actually added "to->sb_rgcount
= 1;".
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> Thanks,
> Long Li
>
> >
> > > Initializing sb_rgcount as 1 is incorrect in this scenario. If no
> > > realtime subvolume exists, the value of sb_rgcount should be set
> > > to zero. Fix it by initializing sb_rgcount based on the actual number
> > > of realtime blocks.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 87fe4c34a383 ("xfs: create incore realtime group structures")
> > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > index 3b5623611eba..1ea28f04b75a 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > > @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ __xfs_sb_from_disk(
> > > to->sb_rsumino = NULLFSINO;
> > > } else {
> > > to->sb_metadirino = NULLFSINO;
> > > - to->sb_rgcount = 1;
> > > + to->sb_rgcount = to->sb_rblocks > 0 ? 1 : 0;
> > > to->sb_rgextents = 0;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.39.2
> > >
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-31 2:34 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix two issues regarding mount failures Long Li
2024-12-31 2:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: correct the sb_rgcount when the disk not support rt volume Long Li
2025-01-06 19:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 13:11 ` Long Li
2025-01-08 0:32 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-08 1:26 ` Long Li
2025-01-08 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 7:22 ` Long Li
2025-01-08 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 7:10 ` Long Li
2024-12-31 2:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix mount hang during primary superblock recovery failure Long Li
2025-01-06 19:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-07 13:39 ` Long Li
2025-01-08 0:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250108003206.GL6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lonuxli.64@gmail.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox