From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:50:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108005057.GB1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250102140411.14617-6-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 02:04:09PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Currently atomic writes size permitted is fixed at the blocksize.
>
> To start to remove this restriction, use xfs_get_atomic_write_attr() to
> find the per-inode atomic write limits and check according to that.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Seems reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 12 +++++-------
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 2c810f75dbbd..68c22c0ab235 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -949,14 +949,12 @@ xfs_file_write_iter(
> return xfs_file_dax_write(iocb, from);
>
> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> - /*
> - * Currently only atomic writing of a single FS block is
> - * supported. It would be possible to atomic write smaller than
> - * a FS block, but there is no requirement to support this.
> - * Note that iomap also does not support this yet.
> - */
> - if (ocount != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
> + unsigned int unit_min, unit_max;
> +
> + xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(ip, &unit_min, &unit_max);
> + if (ocount < unit_min || ocount > unit_max)
> return -EINVAL;
> +
> ret = generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 207e0dadffc3..883ec45ae708 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ xfs_stat_blksize(
> return max_t(uint32_t, PAGE_SIZE, mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize);
> }
>
> -static void
> +void
> xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> unsigned int *unit_min,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h
> index 3c1a2605ffd2..82d3ffbf7024 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h
> @@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ int xfs_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
> extern void xfs_setup_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> extern void xfs_setup_iops(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> extern void xfs_diflags_to_iflags(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool init);
> +extern void xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + unsigned int *unit_min, unsigned int *unit_max);
>
> #endif /* __XFS_IOPS_H__ */
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-02 14:04 [PATCH v3 0/7] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] iomap: Increase iomap_dio_zero() size limit John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iomap: Add zero unwritten mappings dio support John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on atomic writes John Garry
2025-01-08 0:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xfs: Add extent zeroing support for " John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-01-08 0:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] xfs: Add RT atomic write unit max to xfs_mount John Garry
2025-01-08 0:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] xfs: Update xfs_get_atomic_write_attr() for large atomic writes John Garry
2025-01-08 0:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250108005057.GB1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox