From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0DDB76034 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736744694; cv=none; b=Cba1sRDE8BBdRqgfmlwPRDAOwJIg/RWo8MUwf4j8QQu7jNeYKcilbK59e2ZUj7svNSdi1JxVIIoAvWdfVPvvNGIdBnOyuow91G+6WK/A83710ieHQL7M6eINVz35SKy9ojxcDt+goqbP73BibDiqrRv9JuQLXOG+3luhj5nhnUU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736744694; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hAwcPOJpYvOg2yeuZvaN+JeU9ExO0R2a+7YrPWCu9e4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iVw8a9SUOfyK37wcFGPlodd6se1UUhYAuWkaby+rfEAQBjMjQFhzG8sjpwE2EaJQUAhUgOfAxeWVmWTRafuEoWeeji7K02tht/wEN3mHPLZGT+fJLJg6M9CLvEbdHVAZWx2Me+TPUGwrhZ2hbugUSwZ/Z7BuWkCWlFf1dtExAFQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jOmakcf1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jOmakcf1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4233CC4CED6; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:04:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736744694; bh=hAwcPOJpYvOg2yeuZvaN+JeU9ExO0R2a+7YrPWCu9e4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jOmakcf1ONwpe+poIP4K2Ia5kgOhJWEPuJA2PuWvf8nWhfjJTJ3Xrs8f6EpOe/UrH Gm+MXsucXC3QK4bLspDSBuSmDhu+oWNRGTSGQEwtx5p/R013A4XVlU2JoCbiGo3eKn qynPW1EM3cnq2mMRqR9lVM6SMJZGg4596r6KA+Qs0v7JeAUjiep7JZrU2rqYdk86pc UStd56vfAIU8ExG4FgG21xSyELhqF23LLxUgKIVmhHSIhwUA7i5Q0bzf0wUJJoHXmF eM4f8sAvyZZgCHS9eGgGFBHGGV/Lfa+1gGqS+ozUsN0Zhyqdjncmq19braewtYXGpW 9OBQ03RN+bcIA== Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:04:53 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment above xfs_discard_endio Message-ID: <20250113050453.GT1387004@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250113042626.2051997-1-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250113042626.2051997-1-hch@lst.de> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 05:26:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > pagb_lock has been replaced with eb_lock. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Yep, I guess we forgot that one. :/ Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c > index c4bd145f5ec1..3f2403a7b49c 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ xfs_discard_endio_work( > > /* > * Queue up the actual completion to a thread to avoid IRQ-safe locking for > - * pagb_lock. > + * eb_lock. > */ > static void > xfs_discard_endio( > -- > 2.45.2 >