From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2376B23242C for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736870022; cv=none; b=UndhIqMvCzD1NXei6BPOyhGyGFIMYkOrbozYMZSSRpaifa1rQ4sReD2l2IESiepknO1mvLMtAmPQ+ndtPeLgeci1D8hp9AQfZddbEubqRtnqEz2MMS6BQ2XmlqcTusLvyCy+ZBrNL+PB01UIHICPkJkz9s6BkPjKAQUsheTer7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736870022; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DTVNRchXJo7k78IThZM3H70cX8w9HwgQuQlTWhW13WY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XDwh1ms8K30OZvsgdgaAIdbVNCQL2Un8SV0u6iJg8ZNMbHAiCHsO4BeYLC0Uec/KU5R06t/isVQBCRua+/LBn6TEwa7RmqcAbaMebZssEjlMAM/hvH4hrMjgsAHN34u6EaVC+RpPtOCbg75+k2tGZD4zxiGAf1t4CwFdulPQHjs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FifQnXY1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FifQnXY1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC1EC4CEDD; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:53:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736870021; bh=DTVNRchXJo7k78IThZM3H70cX8w9HwgQuQlTWhW13WY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FifQnXY1uN3v/l9T59bLkBQz1nsG7xmrefIRz1D/x3D0v10jkMcWeOK3XqZDF8Z63 p3gMvinROOAvveMThRfbE0ijDoJaux+hHRmfaCQYrTrHgYo+/z4jMxNryjG4uzo4h9 LUCkdmiYp/on4QwQLPF0c/K/2QZ+kSQkbYsSVfsZ1q/I2gHxSs4/N+gsjxHwdyrjSH 1xCPQtS6JKSJURiIWRNu7+yttO7B/3iscnK3a2RZEC+F2wOmbEQSQsEBIoskdXJPrc WWGJgGmFoYTQ8f1Rt1E7m4TJW61ZCEQmpNbHGqDoWiTHOQnC0WDMachTl0ubr1fgWL oLqhD/ngkJvzQ== Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 07:53:40 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Carlos Maiolino Cc: xfs , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: lock dquot buffer before detaching dquot from b_li_list Message-ID: <20250114155340.GI1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250109005402.GH1387004@frogsfrogsfrogs> <173677158754.21511.9707589214851624907.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20250113162134.GD1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:45:48AM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 08:21:34AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:33:07PM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:54:02 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > We have to lock the buffer before we can delete the dquot log item from > > > > the buffer's log item list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Applied to next-rc, thanks! > > > > > > [1/1] xfs: lock dquot buffer before detaching dquot from b_li_list > > > commit: 4e7dfb45fe08b2b54d7fe2499fab0eeaa42004ad > > > > Um... you already pushed this to Linus, why is it queued again? > > (albeit with the same commit id so I don't think it matters) > > I rushed to push this patch to -rc7 so I didn't end up sending a TY message to > it. It was still on my b4 stack when I sent the last TY batch. > > Which reminds me I should update the message, as the TY is going after I push to > for-next, no to next-rc :). Ah, ok. Carry on! :) --D > > > > > --D > > > > > Best regards, > > > -- > > > Carlos Maiolino > > > > > > > > >