public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: cem@kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Prevent mounting with quotas in norecovery if quotacheck is needed
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 22:24:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250115062438.GG3557553@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115061840.269757-1-cem@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:18:32AM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> Mounting a filesystem that requires quota state changing will generate a
> transaction.
> 
> We already check for a read-only device; we should do that for
> norecovery too.
> 
> A quotacheck on a norecovery mount, and with the right log size, will cause
> the mount process to hang on:
> 
> [<0>] xlog_grant_head_wait+0x5d/0x2a0 [xfs]
> [<0>] xlog_grant_head_check+0x112/0x180 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_log_reserve+0xe3/0x260 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x179/0x250 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x101/0x260 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_sync_sb+0x3f/0x80 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_qm_mount_quotas+0xe3/0x2f0 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_mountfs+0x7ad/0xc20 [xfs]
> [<0>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x762/0xa50 [xfs]
> [<0>] get_tree_bdev_flags+0x131/0x1d0
> [<0>] vfs_get_tree+0x26/0xd0
> [<0>] vfs_cmd_create+0x59/0xe0
> [<0>] __do_sys_fsconfig+0x4e3/0x6b0
> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160
> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> 
> This is caused by a transaction running with bogus initialized head/tail
> 
> I initially hit this while running generic/050, with random log
> sizes, but I managed to reproduce it reliably here with the steps
> below:
> 
> mkfs.xfs -f -lsize=1025M -f -b size=4096 -m crc=1,reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i
> sparse=1 /dev/vdb2 > /dev/null
> mount -o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota /dev/vdb2 /mnt
> xfs_io -x -c 'shutdown -f' /mnt
> umount /mnt
> mount -o ro,norecovery,usrquota,grpquota,prjquota  /dev/vdb2 /mnt
> 
> Last mount hangs up
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c
> index 37f1230e7584..eae106ca7e1b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c
> @@ -97,10 +97,11 @@ xfs_qm_newmount(
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If the device itself is read-only, we can't allow
> -	 * the user to change the state of quota on the mount -
> -	 * this would generate a transaction on the ro device,
> -	 * which would lead to an I/O error and shutdown
> +	 * If the device itself is read-only and/or in norecovery
> +	 * mode, we can't allow the user to change the state of
> +	 * quota on the mount - this would generate a transaction
> +	 * on the ro device, which would lead to an I/O error and
> +	 * shutdown.
>  	 */
>  
>  	if (((uquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> @@ -109,7 +110,8 @@ xfs_qm_newmount(
>  	    (!gquotaondisk &&  XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
>  	     (pquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
>  	    (!pquotaondisk &&  XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)))  &&
> -	    xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state")) {
> +	    (xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state") ||
> +	     xfs_has_norecovery(mp))) {
>  		xfs_warn(mp, "please mount with%s%s%s%s.",
>  			(!quotaondisk ? "out quota" : ""),
>  			(uquotaondisk ? " usrquota" : ""),

The logic seems ok, but (as I mentioned in office hours this morning) I
wonder if we shouldn't just ignore quota entirely for a norecovery
mount?

I guess for metadir we also could change the message to say "don't mount
with any quota options" since the quota mount options are persistent now.

--D

> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-15  6:18 [PATCH] xfs: Prevent mounting with quotas in norecovery if quotacheck is needed cem
2025-01-15  6:24 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-15  6:32   ` Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250115062438.GG3557553@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox