From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019E9157485; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736922596; cv=none; b=IlMYCPMo7Cq6zOlwQ5eC7IenN3euwiPpKskkwazjpyCPUj4ERYZi9jPbfMK9cxkVO/8CQjuIKxPiEY1Z3HDbS0cOhkh3lhbxTCbCTa0hBwaIz51XHh92BOf9P86KLvCigzPR/aMxV96N0to5Y8jwtRNEvs3L+aAS/8S81gKqhOw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736922596; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nvvxrLV3v4C0ac5BFLzCHa3NeNbc0UopIrhs2Y5ehdo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GBa/6h40HHC+tO41iusGDR6wsfJSRAp1emsYMUymThO4CgkApiAxOcJ90Aiy4zHoF+U69s9BCg+jWGQQU9k9p/ReH5qY/wMGcqDpdk9kiilYdn173q1JzHGtG9BX4p46dWuFEQbMJq3PMu7EH8E5wv1EyfFtFLDm0WS4aTSArl4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LNQZoZHi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LNQZoZHi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85371C4CEDF; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 06:29:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736922595; bh=nvvxrLV3v4C0ac5BFLzCHa3NeNbc0UopIrhs2Y5ehdo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LNQZoZHin6VPGvO/xCrdz3vs4hjP2TLsgzhmtxEbpXdAQI0wiNbYufTiqcda7S6oi 1a8UOjH3pUfwBvtpjUIgfnD1ltl7GkJbK8WwCXQGmvGZyUxoj5jIa0ymGYz6tUMybX h4xZ1APpgPKS9GDTk19V3XE5edlT+q2nGLrkhkg36nsVLwiIa3fwWZi+YO2DuKHWe7 UyA1nESmXHfEprMdY5s1ux9ILMsRnGvdboG4Lm8X1IarBAlBnmqyiw+SHfgmOTXlDt jY/Vj8BCc/nKj0UmDtKC+Osgwc99uEjQghRaG1tcB0O5g4+A/CQk5q8O+FdmJuIyxJ qg8BdLoZ3gJJw== Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 22:29:55 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs-stable , stable@vger.kernel.org, david.flynn@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix online repair probing when CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_REPAIR=n Message-ID: <20250115062955.GC3566461@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250114224819.GD2103004@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20250115060615.GA29387@lst.de> <20250115062037.GF3557553@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20250115062743.GA29997@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250115062743.GA29997@lst.de> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:27:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:20:37PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Good point, we could cut it off right then and there. Though this seems > > a little gross: > > > > if (xchk_could_repair(sc)) > > #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_REPAIR > > sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT; > > #else > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > #endif > > return 0; > > > > but I don't mind. Some day the stubs will go away, fingers crossed. > > We'll I'd write it as: > > if (xchk_could_repair(sc)) { > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_REPAIR)) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT; > } > > but I'm fine with either version: I like your version /much/ better. > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Thanks! --D