From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59DD91CAA62; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737667376; cv=none; b=DKAzZl3ao662EG1wbFdbrRzNQFIfPOH1amd2Mdo0Lcvlxe5xB1DyibBYdTNMdJ4RBBp0UChbRvuV97rqwNSHiHotfdLvfYtbjBCWE6hakFMJ9LeuTFeOhKU9vyYZd6gDoVAAn+eQS+Y1cFNXJCMJ4H99aWyYB/4gh8AJPZUBXkY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737667376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pcCYUQti3zxLorlvGwMMCsDLeOXvWxsfjOp/gwgugyA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bDDcNkosV+Y6iN2EhitmfzLvocuaXpi1r0bpt2hNf0vw/zl9R2LUaeqISo+N34TwNwjuCagsT2crJT+PsRrz4bi5vWexG6ZDP1Cq0C1rRRJzSLMXDP0RKM1J6JaKRu/6XvUE3GZq3izkbwNqYvJGPOMoBG7KZmd8607xLVnkxKQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JjuaNpZl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JjuaNpZl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5E70C4CED3; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:22:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737667375; bh=pcCYUQti3zxLorlvGwMMCsDLeOXvWxsfjOp/gwgugyA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JjuaNpZlMQhyjxo5Sr3S2k+So8VnuJZIbhOugCoTvi0cHgW0SMXjSmvgJyOQ7T7A2 VM/W3RQubRWHn9ITIFooCCksZReGitNdagEyjkKSBj49qoaEcbRhx6yorbFtFZNL+n 1gtEQdp92IuXzypv2n587MXnV7zve8dFirTIkxJ11P8EccHB1N4ITCqG0U6HWlR+Fz gO7tpEle4QlOcJjKf/DduCG6RxfKI5+9PGQotF51nku6KZ5Yj8kbkbHKLvI0dmCLo6 ZUK0wBJJSC3GsRj03ZEzmxE9SV0spq9ntfgBg/e//RJjdBDcN8ZIRMdVX3NIthlL/7 +cLyFHwnfxDyA== Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:22:55 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Carlos Maiolino , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: xfs: new code for 6.14 (needs [GIT PULL]?) Message-ID: <20250123212255.GG1611770@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250123183848.GF1611770@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:46:47PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 10:38, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > It's been a couple of days and this PR hasn't been merged yet. Is there > > a reason to delay the merge, or is it simply that the mail was missing > > the usual "[GIT PULL]" tag in the subject line and it didn't get > > noticed? > > No, it's in my queue. You don't need to have the "git pull" in the > subject, as long as it says "git" and "pull" _somewhere_, and the xfs > pull request email does say that. > > But I tend to batch up merge window requests by area, and I did my > initial filesystem pulls on Monday. The xfs pull hadn't come in at > that point, and then I went on to different areas. > > I'm getting back to filesystems today, but since I have great > time-planning abilities (not!) I also am on the road today at an > Intel/AMD architecture meeting, so my pulls today are going to be a > bit sporadic. Ah, ok. Thanks for pulling! :) --D > > Linus >