From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0F918FDDE; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738770995; cv=none; b=PfFl+Sn7VYjzbf9ceuM/oBetehxAdgS35/HBsfU4xarQ1oCKlip+YvRnh4yfoK0fTJ2ici8o0WqsCRMrqrQWjCxWMgNuauyLDeZuzHeY/PUnnK3UIVSh0wk2mUtiyIbNxLq8/V+6fCyZBfdcPHrDYGGNcspABo3XY4swWgM/FJY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738770995; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MFQF50d7FG+/Q6NzXwHuucLTVQVAWALAr+y3xBK51Kg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CltdaFdTPE+n3sP29GNTXv9KPSaMhA0NTwqZZO7zemGNbyhjXeanPS68KocN3fsTfrNufsS3UqbhkrGT9NXeMc8bcsrWAcmX7+WE2F/eojg1nDHpyPI59pC2HeKwu4UeR/T61IinOu+B/DLE4cQUULnJnBeqDOgqZIV8gMOwGUs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=u+SZtybM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="u+SZtybM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D771CC4CEE4; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:56:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738770994; bh=MFQF50d7FG+/Q6NzXwHuucLTVQVAWALAr+y3xBK51Kg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=u+SZtybMGB+SDMfJiK/bnGwJ5tO/uVoPdwrNcN6eQ5FIBLWl+ObbL66Z5zUn+9oUi wpIly07ezw7YN0ePL+zfFUMKiUkGkktH+9i/4NhrtrS+0301zi+eaTaESpCasb3Lrz suPBI20beTOlDyn7Oj/pf3a513RtWZwWweBXafeWPYKBW1U6yuNNaw19Pbz+KPQziN C650kkcocJnYihrlFXMt63XQNxBtgzzvdw9z5GGydCLyxJyq6/YOwLXK2aEFVH/ENG rXs+FVYhOMLjgrXSYXX3pJ7D360R/p/gUy8+6B7KWb4++w2lVW5Y544I4TaGPI7Cvt 64w4Ug0K+5c8A== Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 07:56:34 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Greg KH Cc: xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+3126ab3db03db42e7a31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, eflorac@intellique.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC 6.12] xfs: bug fixes for 6.12.y LTS Message-ID: <20250205155634.GG21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <173869499323.410229.9898612619797978336.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <2025020556-bagful-cosmos-2a72@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025020556-bagful-cosmos-2a72@gregkh> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 06:55:19AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:51:15AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's a bunch of bespoke hand-ported bug fixes for 6.12 LTS. > > > > If you're going to start using this code, I strongly recommend pulling > > from my git trees, which are linked below. > > > > With a bit of luck, this should all go splendidly. > > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. > > Should we take these into the next stable release, or do you want us to > wait a bit? Let's wait a day or two to see if anyone has objections, and then I'll send this series again without the RFC tag. Already I think I see that the first patch needs a cc:stable tag to capture the version. --D > thanks, > > greg k-h >