public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
	hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:47:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205194740.GW21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204120127.2396727-9-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 12:01:25PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> When completing a CoW-based write, each extent range mapping update is
> covered by a separate transaction.
> 
> For a CoW-based atomic write, all mappings must be changed at once, so
> change to use a single transaction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c    |  5 ++++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 12af5cdc3094..170d7891f90d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -527,7 +527,10 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
>  	nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  
>  	if (flags & IOMAP_DIO_COW) {
> -		error = xfs_reflink_end_cow(ip, offset, size);
> +		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
> +			error = xfs_reflink_end_atomic_cow(ip, offset, size);
> +		else
> +			error = xfs_reflink_end_cow(ip, offset, size);
>  		if (error)
>  			goto out;
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> index dbce333b60eb..60c986300faa 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> @@ -990,6 +990,54 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow(
>  		trace_xfs_reflink_end_cow_error(ip, error, _RET_IP_);
>  	return error;
>  }
> +int
> +xfs_reflink_end_atomic_cow(
> +	struct xfs_inode		*ip,
> +	xfs_off_t			offset,
> +	xfs_off_t			count)
> +{
> +	xfs_fileoff_t			offset_fsb;
> +	xfs_fileoff_t			end_fsb;
> +	int				error = 0;
> +	struct xfs_mount		*mp = ip->i_mount;
> +	struct xfs_trans		*tp;
> +	unsigned int			resblks;
> +	bool				commit = false;
> +
> +	trace_xfs_reflink_end_cow(ip, offset, count);
> +
> +	offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(ip->i_mount, offset);
> +	end_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(ip->i_mount, offset + count);
> +
> +	resblks = XFS_NEXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(ip->i_mount,
> +				(unsigned int)(end_fsb - offset_fsb),
> +				XFS_DATA_FORK);
> +
> +	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0,

xfs gained reflink support for realtime volumes in 6.14-rc1, so you now
have to calculate for that in here too.

> +			XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> +	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
> +
> +	while (end_fsb > offset_fsb && !error)
> +		error = xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent_locked(ip, &offset_fsb,
> +						end_fsb, tp, &commit);

Hmm.  Attaching intent items to a transaction consumes space in that
transaction, so we probably ought to limit the amount that we try to do
here.  Do you know what that limit is?  I don't, but it's roughly
tr_logres divided by the average size of a log intent item.

This means we need to restrict the size of an untorn write to a
double-digit number of fsblocks for safety.

The logic in here looks reasonable though.

--D

> +
> +	if (error || !commit)
> +		goto out_cancel;
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		trace_xfs_reflink_end_cow_error(ip, error, _RET_IP_);
> +	error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
> +	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> +	return error;
> +out_cancel:
> +	xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
> +	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> +	return error;
> +}
>  
>  /*
>   * Free all CoW staging blocks that are still referenced by the ondisk refcount
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
> index ef5c8b2398d8..2c3b096c1386 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ extern int xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
>  		xfs_off_t count, bool cancel_real);
>  extern int xfs_reflink_end_cow(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
>  		xfs_off_t count);
> +		int
> +xfs_reflink_end_atomic_cow(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
> +		xfs_off_t count);
>  extern int xfs_reflink_recover_cow(struct xfs_mount *mp);
>  extern loff_t xfs_reflink_remap_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
>  		struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, loff_t len,
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-05 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04 12:01 [PATCH RFC 00/10] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:35     ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:38       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-05 20:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:21     ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:40       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] xfs: Make xfs_find_trim_cow_extent() public John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-05 20:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:10     ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:44       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:48         ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:43     ` John Garry
2025-02-10 16:59   ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-05 19:47   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-06 10:27     ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:50       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:52         ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-05 19:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06  9:15     ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:53         ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-05 19:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06  8:10     ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250205194740.GW21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox