From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/10] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic()
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:55:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205195540.GY21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204120127.2396727-8-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 12:01:24PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() for dedicated handling of atomic writes.
>
> In case of -EAGAIN being returned from iomap_dio_rw(), reissue the write
> in CoW-based atomic write mode.
>
> In the CoW-based atomic write mode, first unshare blocks so that we don't
> have a cow fork for the data in the range which we are writing.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index fd05b66aea3f..12af5cdc3094 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -619,6 +619,55 @@ xfs_file_dio_write_aligned(
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static noinline ssize_t
> +xfs_file_dio_write_atomic(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + struct kiocb *iocb,
> + struct iov_iter *from)
> +{
> + unsigned int iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
> + bool use_cow = false;
> + unsigned int dio_flags;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> +retry:
> + ret = xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write(iocb, &iolock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = xfs_file_write_checks(iocb, from, &iolock);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + if (use_cow) {
> + ret = xfs_reflink_unshare(ip, iocb->ki_pos,
> + iov_iter_count(from));
Nit: continuation lines should be indented two tabs:
ret = xfs_reflink_unshare(ip, iocb->ki_pos,
iov_iter_count(from));
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + trace_xfs_file_direct_write(iocb, from);
> + if (use_cow)
> + dio_flags = IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_COW;
> + else
> + dio_flags = 0;
I also think you could eliminate use_cow by initializing dio_flags to
zero at the top, OR'ing in IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_COW in the retry clause
below, and using (dio_flags & IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_COW) to determine if you
should call unshare above.
Note: This serializes all the software untorn direct writes. I think
a more performant solution would allocate the cow staging blocks ondisk,
attach them to the directio ioend context, and alter ->iomap_begin and
the ioend remap to use the attached blocks, but that's a lot more
surgery.
--D
> +
> + ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, &xfs_direct_write_iomap_ops,
> + &xfs_dio_write_ops, dio_flags, NULL, 0);
> +
> + if (ret == -EAGAIN && !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) && !use_cow) {
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
> + iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> + use_cow = true;
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> +out_unlock:
> + if (iolock)
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Handle block unaligned direct I/O writes
> *
> @@ -723,6 +772,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
> return -EINVAL;
> if ((iocb->ki_pos | count) & ip->i_mount->m_blockmask)
> return xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned(ip, iocb, from);
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
> + return xfs_file_dio_write_atomic(ip, iocb, from);
> return xfs_file_dio_write_aligned(ip, iocb, from);
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 12:01 [PATCH RFC 00/10] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:35 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-05 20:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:21 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] xfs: Make xfs_find_trim_cow_extent() public John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-05 20:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:10 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:48 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:55 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-06 10:43 ` John Garry
2025-02-10 16:59 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-05 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:27 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:52 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-05 19:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 9:15 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:53 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-05 19:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 8:10 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250205195540.GY21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox