From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/10] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:40:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206214023.GV21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ad6f42a-e3e0-4c13-859c-07f5e7bd5ec8@oracle.com>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 11:21:13AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>
> > > if (iomi.pos >= dio->i_size ||
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > > index 75bf54e76f3b..0a0b6798f517 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ struct vm_fault;
> > > *
> > > * IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY indicates that I/O and I/O completions for this iomap must
> > > * never be merged with the mapping before it.
> > > + *
> > > + * IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_COW indicates that we require atomic CoW end IO handling.
> >
> > It more indicates that the filesystem is using copy on write to handle
> > an untorn write, and will provide the ioend support necessary to commit
> > the remapping atomically, right?
>
> yes, correct
>
> >
> > > */
> > > #define IOMAP_F_NEW (1U << 0)
> > > #define IOMAP_F_DIRTY (1U << 1)
> > > @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD */
> > > #define IOMAP_F_XATTR (1U << 5)
> > > #define IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY (1U << 6)
> > > +#define IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_COW (1U << 7)
> > > /*
> > > * Flags set by the core iomap code during operations:
> > > @@ -183,6 +186,7 @@ struct iomap_folio_ops {
> > > #define IOMAP_DAX 0
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
> > > #define IOMAP_ATOMIC (1 << 9)
> > > +#define IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW (1 << 10)
> >
> > What does IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW do? There's no description for it (or for
> > IOMAP_ATOMIC).
>
> I'll add a description for both.
>
> > Can you have IOMAP_ATOMIC and IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW both set?
>
> Yes
>
> > Or are they mutually exclusive?
>
> I am not thinking that it might be neater to have a distinct flag for
"not"?
> IOMAP_ATOMIC when we want to try an atomic bio - maybe IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW or
> IOMAP_ATOMIC_BIO? And then also IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_BIO (in addition to
> IOMAP_DIO_ATOMIC_COW).
Yeah, ATOMIC_BIO/ATOMIC_COW is probably clearer both for IOMAP_ and
IOMAP_DIO_ .
--D
> >
> > I'm guessing from the code that ATOMIC_COW requires ATOMIC to be set,
> > but I wonder why because there's no documentation update in the header
> > files or in Documentation/filesystems/iomap/.
>
> Will do.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 12:01 [PATCH RFC 00/10] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:35 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-05 20:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:21 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:40 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] xfs: Make xfs_find_trim_cow_extent() public John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-05 20:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 11:10 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:48 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-05 19:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:43 ` John Garry
2025-02-10 16:59 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-05 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 10:27 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:52 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-05 19:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 9:15 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 11:53 ` John Garry
2025-02-04 12:01 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-05 19:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 8:10 ` John Garry
2025-02-06 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206214023.GV21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox