From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] iomap: export iomap_iter_advance() and return remaining length
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:17:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250207171754.GX21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207143253.314068-7-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:32:49AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> As a final step for generic iter advance, export the helper and
> update it to return the remaining length of the current iteration
> after the advance. This will usually be 0 in the iomap_iter() case,
> but will be useful for the various operations that iterate on their
> own and will be updated to advance as they progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Looks good to me now,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/iomap/iter.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> include/linux/iomap.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/iter.c b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> index 8e0746ad80bd..544cd7a5a16b 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/iter.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> @@ -15,22 +15,16 @@ static inline void iomap_iter_reset_iomap(struct iomap_iter *iter)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Advance to the next range we need to map.
> - *
> - * If the iomap is marked IOMAP_F_STALE, it means the existing map was not fully
> - * processed - it was aborted because the extent the iomap spanned may have been
> - * changed during the operation. In this case, the iteration behaviour is to
> - * remap the unprocessed range of the iter, and that means we may need to remap
> - * even when we've made no progress (i.e. count = 0). Hence the "finished
> - * iterating" case needs to distinguish between (count = 0) meaning we are done
> - * and (count = 0 && stale) meaning we need to remap the entire remaining range.
> + * Advance the current iterator position and output the length remaining for the
> + * current mapping.
> */
> -static inline int iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, s64 count)
> +int iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, u64 *count)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count > iomap_length(iter)))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(*count > iomap_length(iter)))
> return -EIO;
> - iter->pos += count;
> - iter->len -= count;
> + iter->pos += *count;
> + iter->len -= *count;
> + *count = iomap_length(iter);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -93,7 +87,7 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> * advanced at all (i.e. no work was done for some reason) unless the
> * mapping has been marked stale and needs to be reprocessed.
> */
> - ret = iomap_iter_advance(iter, processed);
> + ret = iomap_iter_advance(iter, &processed);
> if (!ret && iter->len > 0)
> ret = 1;
> if (ret > 0 && !iter->processed && !stale)
> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> index f5ca71ac2fa2..f304c602e5fe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ struct iomap_iter {
> };
>
> int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops);
> +int iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, u64 *count);
>
> /**
> * iomap_length_trim - trimmed length of the current iomap iteration
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 14:32 [PATCH v6 00/10] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from iter advance Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] iomap: refactor iomap_iter() length check and tracepoint Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] iomap: lift error code check out of iomap_iter_advance() Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] iomap: lift iter termination logic from iomap_iter_advance() Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] iomap: export iomap_iter_advance() and return remaining length Brian Foster
2025-02-07 17:17 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-02-07 17:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2025-02-07 14:32 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Brian Foster
2025-02-10 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Christian Brauner
2025-02-10 13:53 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250207171754.GX21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox